|
Thank you alot, Ferenc Veres, it was that, what you said, the code should say tdir instead of dir.
if you want to program, you should be able to spot a mistake in the line the
compiler tells you is wrong; rest assured, the compiler will be right almost
all the time, and way more often than you are.
I know that i should be able to analyse and interpret compiler mistakes, and i even dont know, why i put dir before getfiles()
Maybe it wasnt my day yesterday, ... anyway thank you for your help and maybe next time i can help you
Daniel
PS: Sorry about my English, i know, it isn't the best
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am looking to impliment the Security Application Block from the Enterprise Library 3.1.
Does anyone have a good tutorial or sample code I can look at?
Thanks...
Illegal Operation
Making Computer Software Talk
|
|
|
|
|
Illegal Operation wrote: Does anyone have a good tutorial or sample code I can look at?
They hide those in the documentation. Good luck, you're going to need it.
Reference Implementations are executable sample applications that demonstrate patterns & practices guidance in action.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
How can I put the pixel in GDI+.Please don't go to image processing.
There is no tool avalible in C# to put the pixel.
Anybody hep me to get this answer.
Continue...
|
|
|
|
|
You can use Graphics.FillRectangle with a width and height of 1.
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
why are you going to FillRectangle that is use for draw rectangle.
C++ and VC++ have set pixel.
Continue...
|
|
|
|
|
why are you going to FillRectangle that is use for draw rectangle
Well, I don't: I've never needed a SetPixel method, really. I'm just giving you a quick fix.
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
What is a pixel if not a rectangle of size 1x1?
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
|
|
|
|
|
There is in fact a SetPixel method.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
There's Bitmap.SetPixel , but no Graphics.SetPixel .
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you didn't say that you needed it on the graphics object. You spoke of image processing, there's no way you can do image processing without a bitmap, so I assumed you were working with a bitmap. A 1x1 rect or a line that is one pixel in size, are your best bets then, I guess.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
winform program,
I had a DataGridView, and Added some Columns.
the colum1's text is ABC,colum2's text is BCD.
query Data from sql:"select id, name from test"
this.dataGridView1.DataSource = ds;
this.dataGridView1.DataMember = "test";
the data biding at dataGridview new Column caudal.
how to biding at ABC and BCD of DataGridView's Column?
|
|
|
|
|
You have to use <boundfied datafieldname="ABC">
Best Regards,
Chetan Patel
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
If you are looking to set the Column caption of DataGridView to "ABC" and "BCD" after binding it to DataSource (DS) then you can do it in the following manner:
BEGIN CODE
this.dataGridView1.DataSource = ds;
this.dataGridView1.DataMember = "test";
this.dataGridView1.Columns[0].HeaderText = "ABC";
this.dataGridView1.Columns[1].HeaderText = "BCD";
END CODE
I hope this helps .
Regards,
John Adams
ComponentOne LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Still won't do.
when buiding, report Index foul.
before dataGridView binding data,the DataGridView don't has columns,
so report Index foul.I think to is so.
|
|
|
|
|
Your suggestion is viable.
The index foul is my own problem.
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, i have a doubt..
I want to send an object to next page..directly....At there using this object, i want to use its memebers and methods. I need to send objects between aspx pages.
Please help me regarding this...
Thanking you
G. Satish
|
|
|
|
|
Store That object in Session
Best Regards,
Chetan Patel
|
|
|
|
|
By storing the objects in session, the perfomance of applciation will degreed. Any alternative rather than using sessions?
G. Satish
|
|
|
|
|
You've posted this in more than one forum, haven't you ?
The session is really your only hope for what you want to do, that's why it's a bad idea. What specifically are you trying to achieve ?
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Actually first i wrongly posted in c# board, later i realise and post the same in asp.net...
This is not intentionally done..
G. Satish
|
|
|
|
|
Have you considered using Delegates?
I will use Google before asking dumb questions
|
|
|
|
|
This is an ASP.NET question, he's just posted it in the wrong place.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
you can use session or application object for that purpose
|
|
|
|
|
The Application object is a dangerous thing to use here.
Cheers,
Vikram.
Zeppelin's law: In any Soapbox discussion involving Stan Shannon, the probability of the term "leftist" or "Marxist" appearing approaches 1 monotonically.
Harris' addendum: I think you meant "monotonously".
Martin's second addendum: Jeffersonian... I think that should at least get a mention.
|
|
|
|