|
He just told you. If you can't understand what he said, then you probably can't get what you're looking for.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|
|
Please do not post your question more than one time.
Click[^]
Kristian Sixhoej
"Failure is not an option" - Gene Kranz
|
|
|
|
|
I am using VS 2003 to debug an web application.
It works well sometimes, but sometimes it does not. The status bar shows "Setting up server for debugging". It just keeps setting it up forever. I have also put localhost in the trusted sites but no help.
what can be the reason??
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it could be that VS2003 is as flakey as hell when debugging web projects on IIS. This happens to me all the time and I've just got used to either firing IISRESET from the command prompt or killing the ASP.NET worker process from task manager.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I am new to this. Does this mean that have no ti live with this and that I just cannot do anything about it?
|
|
|
|
|
If its the same problem I have then you may have to get used to it. I think its something to do with shadowing in IIS which is a feature where you can deploy stuff to IIS without a break in service. Maybe you can switch it off - I haven't looked. First off, determine whether doing IISRESET after a build stops this problem or whether its something else.
Regards,
Rob Philpott.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone,
I am looking for two tutorials, one for C# XML and the other for C# thread. I have performend search, but all I found are comprehensive ones, which involves other materials making the samples too big.
Do you have any ones to recommend which are dealing with pure XML rendering and pure threading control s much as possible?
BTW: I am a beginner with C# and my book does not cover the two topics too much.
thanks in advance,
George
|
|
|
|
|
Neither is very specific to a language. XML is a standard there is DOM API and SAX API they are very similar in every language I have used them in. Threading is threading and again not language specific. If you learn the concepts it is very simple to translate the language specific tools for your needs.
www.w3schools.com might have some short tutorials and samples on XML etc. If you do much work with XML you also need to learn XPath which you will also find there. You might also try Wikipedia for anything you need a basic introduction into.
For threading there is a site that people frequently give as a good location for learning. I don't remember it but if you search in the C++ / MFC forum you should find where people have given the URL. When I was trying to get a handle on threading I read Advanced Windows by Richter. I believe he has a .NET or even C# book out now that likely has similar threading coverage in it from the .NET platform perspective.
good luck
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks led mike,
1. For XML, I do not mean the basic concept, I mean how to use C# XML SDK/API. Any ideas or recommendations?
2.
led mike wrote: For threading there is a site that people frequently give as a good location for learning. I don't remember it but if you search in the C++ / MFC forum you should find where people have given the URL. When I was trying to get a handle on threading I read Advanced Windows by Richter. I believe he has a .NET or even C# book out now that likely has similar threading coverage in it from the .NET platform perspective.
MFC forum? Confused? Do you mean C++ threading or C# threading? Could you give me some hint about what you mean please?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know about XML, but there's an excellent (and free) e-book on threading in C# here[^]. It's the first hit you get on google actually, so you might have found it already. I suppose it does require you to have some basic skill when it comes to c#, but I wouldn't recommend starting with threading when you're new to c# anyway. Good luck.
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Bekjong,
Cool book!! Thanks again!!
For XML, I do not mean the basic concept, I mean how to use XML lib/API in C#. Any ideas?
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome. I hardly ever use XML, except perhaps for object (de)serialization, which you can find more about here[^].
Standards are great! Everybody should have one!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Bekjong,
Cool. What I want to learn is how to generate XML message and parse XML message. Seems a little different from the link. Thanks all the same. Let me know if you have good idea later.
regards,
George
|
|
|
|
|
hi,
I want to know how to add animation to windows application
Animation ( swf file ..)
Please tell in a step by step format .
Thank You
*** Why EXPERTS behave like a fool ***
|
|
|
|
|
Well, if you want to add a .SWF file then the easiest way would be to insert a web browser control, and have it load the flash file.
So, in a step by step format:
Open code
Go to designer
Insert WebBrowser control
Set Url to path to the .SWF file
Run tha app
My current favourite word is: Nipple!
-SK Genius
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since it is a Microsoft certification, I would have looked at Microsoft website before asking a question anywhere else. Did you do that?
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
First post and a new user. But thank god that he at least posted in a C# forum rather than in Soapbox.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
First post and a new user is no excuse not to have done an appropriate search. That has more to do with common sense, than with CodeProject guidelines.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: common sense
That is actually a misnomer in India right? I mean, looking out for common sense is like searching for a rare diamond. Did you miss out some cute code solicitations in Lounge last week? Precisely, common sense seems to be really uncommon or not so common.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: That is actually a misnomer in India right?
Only there?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak K wrote: common sense seems to be really uncommon or not so common.
What? *Rajesh bangs head on keyboard*
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Well this is a question to the moderators..
Why dont the new answers to the old posts bubble the thread here in this forum??
It is a bit tedious searching for new answers to the old posts..
Som
|
|
|
|
|
This is off topic, we have a forum for suggestions. The answer is, I guess, that it was decided not to write it that way. I don't know why, I mean, it would be easy to change how it works. I guess the people who double post would just post 'bump' messages all the more, and drown everyone else out.
Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++
"also I don't think "TranslateOneToTwoBillion OneHundredAndFortySevenMillion FourHundredAndEightyThreeThousand SixHundredAndFortySeven()" is a very good choice for a function name" - SpacixOne ( offering help to someone who really needed it ) ( spaces added for the benefit of people running at < 1280x1024 )
|
|
|
|