|
Please click on the "edit" link in your post, remove EVERYTHING and ask a specific question with "relevant" source code, if any.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
vineeshV wrote: wprintf(L"\t-- %s\n", pTmpBuf->usri3_name);
printf("\n equlilent string is [%s]\n ",(char*)pTmpBuf->usri3_name);
a simple cast is not enough, you need a string conversion, for instance using WideCharToMultiByte , see this sample.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
vineeshV wrote: wprintf(L"\t-- %s\n", pTmpBuf->usri3_name);
printf("\n equlilent string is [%s]\n ",(char*)pTmpBuf->usri3_name);
Have you tried:
printf("\n equivalent string is [%S]\n ",(char*)pTmpBuf->usri3_name); They don't necessarily hurt anything, but you might also consider removing those unnecessary #include statements.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
int iSize = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP,0,pTmpBuf->usri3_name, -1, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL );
char* lpNarrow = new char[iSize];
lpNarrow[0] = 0;
iSize= WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0,pTmpBuf->usri3_name, -1, lpNarrow, iSize, NULL, NULL );
printf("\n equlilent string is [%s]\n ",lpNarrow);
delete [] lpNarrow;
printf("\n equlilent string is [%S]\n ",pTmpBuf->usri3_name);
best wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks David,
it really works for me ...
The beer is for you !!!!!!!!
vineesh
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I developed an application in MFC dialog,
where i am printing the Html page using ExecWB command.
The problem is, initially my application memory consumption is low.
But when i call print command (ExecWB) the memory usage rises
tremendously.
But for further execution of command its stable..!!
I am not getting whats the exact problem is..??
Plz help me in this regard..
Thanx in advance.
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's something internal to the ExecWB() function.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Do u have any idea or solution how to overcome this problem..?
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
void CWebBrowser2::ExecWB(long cmdID, long cmdexecopt, VARIANT* pvaIn, VARIANT* pvaOut)
{
static BYTE parms[] =
VTS_I4 VTS_I4 VTS_PVARIANT VTS_PVARIANT;
InvokeHelper(0x1f6, DISPATCH_METHOD, VT_EMPTY, NULL, parms,
cmdID, cmdexecopt, pvaIn, pvaOut);
}
Actually its internally calling 'InvokeHelper' which may b using some
stack..
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
Can you show us what ExecWB() is doing?
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
someobj.ExecWB(OLECMDID_PRINT, 0 , NULL, NULL);
I used MS-WebBrowser ocx(CWebBrowser2)
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
Whoops! I thought you had a different ExecWB() in your own namespace and asked for that code. I think agree with what David has said above.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see any problem there.
Don't you like such a behaviour?
BTW What is ExecWB ?
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
CPallini wrote: BTW What is ExecWB?
It's a method of both IWebBrowser2 and CHtmlView .
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
What might be going wrong?? is it starting any new Process??? if yes, can i stop it? This ExecWb takin up huge memory (~20MB). i am sure about the huge number i mentioned (checked it in Task manager's Memory Usage - windowsXP). Any help is most appreciated or is there any other way that I can Print the html document (I am using CWebBrowser2).
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
Shivarudrayya H wrote: What might be going wrong??
Probably nothing.
Shivarudrayya H wrote: is it starting any new Process???
Probably not, since you see a huge increment of your application memory usage.
Shivarudrayya H wrote: his ExecWb takin up huge memory (~20MB).
Why bother about. After all, it is doing the job for you.
Shivarudrayya H wrote: Any help is most appreciated or is there any other way that I can Print the html document (I am using CWebBrowser2).
I don't know a lightweight approach, I'm not an expert about. Maybe CWebBroweser2 support some kind of configuration, but it is only a guess.
If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
|
|
|
|
|
What might be going wrong?? is it starting any new Process??? if yes, can i stop it? This ExecWb takin up huge memory (~20MB). i am sure about the huge number i mentioned (checked it in Task manager's Memory Usage - windowsXP). Any help is most appreciated or is there any other way that I can Print the html document (I am using CWebBrowser2).
Reagards
Shiva
|
|
|
|
|
Shivarudrayya H wrote: This ExecWb takin up huge memory (~20MB).
And why does this concern you?
Shivarudrayya H wrote: ...(checked it in Task manager's Memory Usage - windowsXP).
Which can be deceiving. Read this, especially the last part.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Guys,
A have a client/server application using sockets (TCP/IP) for all the IPC needs. I came across a very interesting problem the other day and is still quite stumped by it:
When the apps are running on a local pc with the network cable not connected, then the apps run fine and the performance is as expected.
However, when the pc is then connected onto the lan the apps suddenly start behaving eratically. They will crash for no reason, or the data transfers between the client and server will become very slow, or timeout and all weird things happen.
I then unplug the cable and voila, all is fine again.
I have tested lots of other network apps on that same pc and they all seem to work fine. Does anyone have any idea as to what may be wrong or where I can start looking for the problem ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
od@ananzi.co.za wrote: A have a client/server application using sockets (TCP/IP) for all the IPC needs...When the apps are running on a local pc with the network cable not connected, then the apps run fine...
How so?
Is your network being saturated with too many packets? Are you using any hubs or switches?
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for, in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
"To have a respect for ourselves guides our morals; to have deference for others governs our manners." - Laurence Sterne
|
|
|
|
|
I have started debugging the apps when on the network and most of the crashed do occur within the sockets/socket handler classes. The crashes are totally random at this stage ...
Is there an easy way to monitor the network for saturation and collissions etc ? (We do not have any measuring hardware) ...
|
|
|
|
|
Try using the loopback address (127.0.0.1), do not use hostnames or computer names.
I would also suggest doing stress tests, the crashs you describe should not happen. Perhaps the current implementation can not handle fragmented packets very well. TCP is a stream oriented protocol, which means data does not have to arrive in the same chunk sizes as they are sent away.
Hope it helps.
/M
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, forgot to mention. I'm actually connecting to 127.0.0.1 already. I rarely use any hostnames, especially not when the client/server are running on the same pc.
I have an application layer running on top of the socket to reassemble the sent data at the receiver end. this layer has not changed over the last two year, so I'm fairly confident that the problem is elsewhere.
But where ??
|
|
|
|
|
What listening port are you using, could it be that incoming LAN traffic not meant for your application is crashing it? Just to make sure bind your listening socket specifically to 127.0.0.1 and not to INADDR_ANY . In any case, do stress testing to reproduce and isolate the trouble maker.
/M
|
|
|
|