|
ITextSharp
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
doPDF
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my homepage Oracle Studios[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello there,
I need to create an application, were i will capture video from my web cam and transmit it to a client through the network. All this must be done in real time. I am new in network programming and i only know a few basic things. A good example on how to do that would be really helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
Chandrias wrote: All this must be done in real time. I am new in network programming and i only know a few basic things.
Then your going to find that writing your own media server pretty impossible. I suggest using an existing server product to automate a lot of this task, such as Microsoft's Media Encoder 9 SDK[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, I have a requirement to use a method from a class that is declared as internal, outside the assembly. I can't just declare it as public for security reasons and I can't move the method into the assembly for architecture reasons.
I thought I was onto a good thing there when I found this attribute... http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.runtime.compilerservices.internalsvisibletoattribute.aspx[^]
So I've successfully marked the assembly as internalsvisible to my calling assembly, but I still can't get the code to compile. does anybody have any idea what my next step is here? There must be a way to get this to work, or the attribute wouldn't exist, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys
Does anyone know where we can find very accomplished Biztalk developers and architects? We have a nice opportunity for them over here....
thanks
steve
|
|
|
|
|
Sure - try posting this on monster.com or the like. Now stop spamming the board. Just go away and pay for job adverts like everybody else does you cheapskate.
|
|
|
|
|
well thanks for that attempt at communication... )
|
|
|
|
|
When we want your opinion we'll give it to you.
Until then go hang out with some of your management monkey peers, feed them some bananas and you will get all sorts of excited grunts of useless comments out of them.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
sksassociates wrote: Does anyone know where we can find very accomplished Biztalk developers and architects?
Yep! Somewhere on this planet called Earth.
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Kreskowiak wrote: this planet called Earth
How about Universe? Often there are stories that people from Mars visit Earth through UFOs right?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
You may like to email webmaster (at) codeproject.com to see whether they would consider having your requirement onto their Jobs Board. That would give you a more powerful and potential reach.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I'm trying to create a second (or third, or however many needed) AppDomain in which to host some Windows Forms. I can create the second AppDomain and the form object just fine. The problem is with actually showing the form. Basically the form partially draws itself and then hangs. I suspect maybe this has something to do with the STAThreadAttribute. What do I need to do to allow the window to run correctly in the second AppDomain?
Thanks,
Brandon W.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using AppDomain.CreateInstance()
Then I'm unwrapping the ObjectHandle, and calling Form.Show().
Pretty much every example I've been able to find hasn't dealt with creating UI objects in another AppDomain. I'm pretty sure this would work fine, if it was just a plain old object.
BW
(Looking at that link now...)
|
|
|
|
|
I might be able to use ExecuteAssembly, but it's going to take a bit more work than I want. I'll try it out.
BW
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone have any tips or tricks to speeding up the page load on a SQL database website.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Learning wrote: Does anyone have any tips or tricks to speeding up the page load on a SQL database website.
No. No one knows how to do that. And if anyone did it certainly would NOT be Microsoft and they certainly would NOT document it and you certainly could NOT find it by searching with Google.[^]
Good luck, you're going to need it.
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
It's good to see that your mockery battery is fully charged.
|
|
|
|
|
mock mock, who's there? Me, i keel you!
led mike
|
|
|
|
|
If that heading caught your attention...
Good - I was trying...
If you know of any solutions to having such a big setup or
distribution file for my c# app could you please help me?
Perhaps some way of building a setup that only embeds the needed
libraries for my app... I dont want any online installers... just the
smallest possible deployment of my application.
Thanx in advance guys!
Dax
|
|
|
|
|
You're best option is to include a link to the .NET Framework runtime installation. Your app's setup size would already be as small as possible as a seperate install.
Your only other option would be to use one of the tools that compiles the required .NET assmeblies into your .EXE, but be prepared to shell out BIG money for these tools. There are no free ones that do this...
|
|
|
|
|
Take a look at NSIS. Provides a very small self-contained executable for installing stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought he was complaining about the "weight" of the .NET Framework runtime install...
|
|
|
|
|
Oh well, perhaps one or both of us mis-interpreted the question...
|
|
|
|