|
No, it's due to a problem in IE (it's not supposed to show the actual number of votes).
BTW, the percentages are incorrect. I tried it on one of my articles with 21 votes. 14 were 5's, but the percentage read "100%". Now, I'm really no math whiz, but that looks more like 66% to me. The other seven votes showed incorrect percentage values as well.
I also don't understand why it only counts "recent data", when all of the numbers are obviously there...
Did you outsource this code Chris?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
modified on Friday, April 25, 2008 10:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - the percentages are wrong and I've fixed that (next release).
We only have recent data because previously we weren't storing individual vote values, just aggregates. As of Dec 4, 2007 we are storing all votes
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhhhh, so only articles posted since Dec 4 will have all of the numbers.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
So is it possible to fix this for FF?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll fix this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Whilst editing profile, in the 'Name/Alias' column, there are always extraneous whitespaces that are prefilled.
Any one else experiencing this issue?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Somebody ban this[^] numbskull please.
Cheers,
Vikram.
The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.
|
|
|
|
|
His profile now shows 'cleaned up'. [0 messages and 0 articles]. Most probably an account 'soft reset' has been issued on it.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
This guy deserves a hard reset. His crap messages keep popping up on my articles. Chris, how about siccing your lawyers on the sites he advertises?
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: Chris, how about siccing your lawyers on the sites he advertises?
It'll be hard to prove an association. For example, someone could start advertising Company A without Company A's knowledge.
Maybe we need Captcha.
|
|
|
|
|
OK I'm not visually impaired but I am a bit of a thicky, but I can never remember what some of the smileys are supposed to mean (particularly cool/suspicious) - can we have alt text for them in posts?
|
|
|
|
|
I believe, it shows right?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong, sadly (at least for me in IE 7). Take for example. Hover your mouse over it - no alt text.
(Also, have a look in the HTML - no alt tag for the Smiley)
|
|
|
|
|
Yep. I observed. But I was actually referring to the list of smileys displayed at the bottom of Message Text Box.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Will be available next release
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
<img> tags should probably have alt and title attributes, since FF uses title instead of alt for the tooltip (not sure which attribute IE looks at these days).
|
|
|
|
|
IE uses the ALT tag as the tooltip (what the TITLE should be) if no TITLE is provided. Personally I'd prefer if Firefox did the same because ALT and TITLE text are so often the same.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The ENtryLIb.net[^] banner is displaying on top of the dropdown menus in FF 2.
You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4....
-- El Corazon
|
|
|
|
|
AdOPs are looking into this. Still some teething problems with the new ad system
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
OK. At least for me this isn't a pressing problem. It only showed up when doing a search, which is less than 1% of my use even before it only being the one banner is take into consideration.
You know, every time I tried to win a bar-bet about being able to count to 1000 using my fingers I always got punched out when I reached 4....
-- El Corazon
|
|
|
|
|
|
All good now
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is on the list, but it seems - after Snakefoot's experience - that it would be good to have 1) a way to submit an article, with the status "do not display", 2) a way to change the status from "displayed" to "do not display", and of course 3) a way to change status from "do not display" to "display".
This might make it easier for people to rework articles after the initial round of nitpicking comments.
|
|
|
|
|
The article moderation is used for that. If the article is absolutely not worthy, it will be summarily rejected. If the article is rejected, the author can always re-submit an improved version of it. Further, approval does not nullify the possibility of an initial round of nitpicking comments.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
What if the article has been accepted, and the author wants to withdraw it while he makes some changes? Does the author have to delete the article?
|
|
|
|