|
Since it appears that articles previously rejected are re-appearing with little or no changes, could we look at maybe creating a page of rejected articles and some of the reasons why, so if something looks familiar we can go back and check?
|
|
|
|
|
Taking it little further, the author who has frequently rejected articles should be still quarantined (since there is a high probability of an abuse of a substandard article posting by him) and made to go through a still tougher scrutiny.
This should be something similar to banking systems where an account which suffers frequent dishonor of checks would be under close scrutiny.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem I see with that is them just creating a new account. It would be nice to user name/article title/reason rejected/link to original article. If you could sort on name/article we could identify abusers. I'd keep more track of them but if the article has already been removed then I don't know about it.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a serious bug in the article submission wizard at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/SubmitStep1.aspx
If you don't enter anything and click "Next", you get this ugly error!
Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Ticket: 23040
NO VALIDATION!!!!!
Certified VB6, SQL 7 and ASP developer
|
|
|
|
|
No. I am presented with a ValidationSummary demanding BaseName, ArticleTitle and a one line description. It even has a serverside validation for blank spaces:
The basename contained web-unfriendly characters. The name has been changed from " a" to "__a"<br />
Subsection must be in a valid state.<br />
A section needs to be selected. <br />
A subsection needs to be selected.<br />
We respectfully ask that you please read and indicate your acceptance of the contributor's agreement. This agreement allows us to publish your article and outlines your rights and obligations.<br />
Please, choose at least one attribute, that can be applied to your article.
Which browser are you using?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Apple Safari.
I just tried the same thing in IE and the validation works.
Any idea why it doesn't work in Safari?
Certified VB6, SQL 7 and ASP developer
|
|
|
|
|
Which version of Safari?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When click on "latest message" of our blog than the rate was also display on screen but now no rate is displayed.
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. A known issue we are fixing hopefully today
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok Thanks
Yes U Can ...If U Can ,Dream it , U can do it ...ICAN
|
|
|
|
|
I have not got any RSS feed from the Lounge for the last few days, and if I check the feed through IE it appears to be empty.
Regards,
Brett
|
|
|
|
|
Yes and also other CP feeds as well.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banning him and he comes right back. Time probably for Chris Maunder to set the legal team a target.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Pimpdog was never banned, if he was his name is back in use again
You're right maybe legally you could prevent him from posting abusive content over and over again
|
|
|
|
|
Pimpdog, CSS, Henize etc, if they all point to the same person, and that might be a little difficult to legally prove short of seizing and forensic analysis of computer equiupment. However if proof can be established, then surely there are legal solutions to this problem.
But will these legal solutions be more costly than the alternative of putting up with his anti-social behaviour whatever his name was or happens to be/become.
modified 1-Aug-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think if you ban him when he appears, he may get bored and move on.
I'd love to see which orginating IP Addresse(s) he's coming from because I'd be be able to stop him from opening another account.
|
|
|
|
|
norm .net wrote: orginating IP Addresse(s)
Little difficult though not impossible task right? At least from Asian countries, ISPs mostly give dynamic IPs to users when they connect to the Internet. Hence we run risk of blocking genuine users from the region, if we resort to IP-based bans.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar wrote: At least from Asian countries
He's from the states, and every IP address I've had from an ISP has been static.
|
|
|
|
|
Ever heard of a proxy?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymizers?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
If he using one, that explains the infrequent posts.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup!, doubt he's that clever to set up and use one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
His message was automatically removed, so it looks like enough folks deamed his post offensive enough to report it. No one quoted his post, so it's as if it never existed.
Maybe this is enough? When a poster posts something that crosses the line (wherever that line is), it should get reported by enough people so that it is automatically removed. If everyone plays it cool and doesn't reply to the original post, than the result is similar to banning the poster.
What I'm suggesting is that 1) People not reply abusive and offensive posters, and 2) We should become more aggressive in reporting them.
The danger with 2 is that non-offensive or borderline posts will get removed. However, if we consider the poster a special case (someone who's had at least one account deleted), I don't think anyone will object.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
|