|
GIT and CVS should be in the options.
In fact, I used 2, namely CVS and SVN. CVS is for the old legacy projects which we do not wish to move to SVN.
|
|
|
|
|
Most people use more than one source control system. Well I use 3
|
|
|
|
|
My department (about 10 developers) has active code in:
Visual Source Safe
PVCS
CVS
ClearCase
|
|
|
|
|
I second this as well - TFS at work, Perforce at home
-----
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
|
|
|
|
|
Well for my projects I use CVS and SVN. To get code updates (mostly on the linux side) I have used hg, cvs, svn, git and bzr.
John
|
|
|
|
|
No option for CVS?
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Caldecott wrote: No option for CVS?
Thank God!
|
|
|
|
|
I am also using CVS. Now my vote didnt count
|
|
|
|
|
I also think, that CVS would be much more rated, if there will be a radio button for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, I voted for it but it still does not appear in the list. I've used other systems in the past including perforce(which is awful) and like CVS for its simplicity to set up and use on both UNIX and Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, absurd isn't it? It must be one of the best-known source code control systems in existence, although it is getting a bit long in the tooth. Anyway, I use it, although I think I would switch to Subversion if I didn't have so much time invested in it.
|
|
|
|
|
We are still using CVS served on a linux server. I started using it on a project in the 90s and the repository has grown from then to include the 500K+ lines of my code + 1 to 2 times that amount of other users code. The main reason not to move to subversion is that we really like the client application on windows (wincvs). Since rapidsvn is improving I am willing to give subversion a look especially because we need to move to a server that is not hosted on our network (too hard/expensive to get firewall exceptions/DMZ in our hospital) so a user can access the server remotely.
John
|
|
|
|
|
+1 to CVS from me too. We have more than 30 projects in CSV by this moment and keep counting.
Well... we think to move on Subversion soon... but we had these thoughts fom over an year now
|
|
|
|
|
I do use CVS and SVN in different development environments. Only SVN counts here .
--
Sincerely yours, Peter A. Kurishev
|
|
|
|
|
Oh my GOD !
Still some of you using VSS ? this is a very dangerous source control ! do you want to loose your work ?
|
|
|
|
|
I want to loose my work on the world... (and not lose it).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Most befitting definition.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts... --William Shakespeare
|
|
|
|
|
Slow as hell!
I'm partially telecommuter and I doubt I could work normally with it from home.
|
|
|
|
|
While it does have limitations, SourceSafe works reasonably well. It's less bug-ridden and much less complex than a number of the other options in the poll. The key to SourceSafe integrity is keep the data base within limits (5GB and 10 users), regular use of the ANALYZE tool, and frequent backups.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I like to live dangerously...
worse, there's projects at work where the vss database is so big it can't be taken offline for long enough to fix the errors in it!
|
|
|
|
|
We currently use VSS.
It is relatively buggy and I believe it's limitations are well known. For example someone mentioned 10 devs and less than 5 gbs... I'd be much more conservative than that!
And yes, frequent analyzes and backups are a MUST!
On the other hand, at least it's free and well integrated into VS and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
did you know Subversion is totally free ? and very well integrated with everything ?
|
|
|
|
|
Alexandre GRANVAUD wrote: do you want to loose your work ?
and lose your business?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
All the world's a stage,
And all the men and women merely players.
They have their exits and their entrances;
And one man in his time plays many parts... --William Shakespeare
|
|
|
|
|
I am using SCCS.
Regards ,
Nishu
|
|
|
|