|
Hi Rave
Please go to the Company[^] site and click the Email link.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
thank you i sent my file to you email address. please look and give me Only Success word.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rave
Sorry, mission not completed successfully ...
The file you sent is not a valid RTF document. Also WordPad/Word does convert the file into plain text. According the RTF Specification[^], a RTF Document starts with the {\rtf1} Tag. A minimal RTF looks like:
{\rtf1foobar} What is the source of this document?
Has been used the correct encoding during the serialization?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
than k you for your effort, so i can tell to my client that file not valid? .
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
how to use hash table as virtual data base for checking string matches stored in hash table
any idea
the quieter u become more u hear
|
|
|
|
|
System.Collections.Hashtable , or (better) System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary
|
|
|
|
|
pls can u give me a small example program for this....
in msdn it very big.... and its not the concept i'm looking for
the quieter u become more u hear
|
|
|
|
|
No one is really going to code your work for you around here.
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way I can without knowing more about what problem you're having.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
i developed a desktop application which use some sourcesafe apis for showing reports(file name, user naem, comments). In my pc there is sourcesafe 5. but when i am going to run this application from another pc(no sourcesafe) it shows a error (error: 80040154).
How can i configure the new pc for running the application. I do not want to use sorcesafe on that pc.
Thanks in adv.
A.
|
|
|
|
|
arif_pyxisnet wrote: developed a desktop application which use some sourcesafe apis
OK, you used the SourceSafe API's, but
arif_pyxisnet wrote: I do not want to use sorcesafe on that pc.
This little problem will stop you from running your application on this PC. If you use the API's, you have to have them on every machine that your application will run on. If the API's are not on the machine, how is your application supposed to call them!?!?
You simply have no choice. You MUST install SourceSafe you wrote your app against on each PC that's going to use your application.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
I'm just working on some Data Access bits and I've run into a bit of an issue I'm not sure how best to deal with.
I have a method that retrieves data from SQL but this might be SQL/SQLExpress/SQLCe how would you best deal with this? I could have another property (enum) go into the class/method that specifies whether the object build a SqlConnection or SqlCeConnection but I was wondering if there was a more elegant solution.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Program against the interface. One declares an IConnection , and you can then dump an SqlConnection or an SqlCeConnection in it
Like this;
IConnection con = new SqlConnection();
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under System.Data.IDbConnection
I are troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure there's a better way - but this is the way I do it (rough template!)
DataBase db = new DataBase();
db.DataBaseToUse = DataBases.SQLExpress;
DataSet result = db.GetData();
public enum DataBases
{
SQL = 0,
SQLExpress = 1,
}
internal interface IDataBase
{
DataSet GetData();
}
public class DataBase : IDataBase
{
IDataBase databaseInUse = new SQLDataBase();
public DataBases DataBaseToUse
{
set
{
switch (value)
{
case DataBases.SQLExpress:
databaseInUse = new SQLExpressDataBase();
break;
default:
databaseInUse = new SQLDataBase();
break;
}
}
}
public DataSet GetData()
{
return databaseInUse.GetData();
}
}
internal class SQLDataBase : IDataBase
{
public DataSet GetData()
{
return new DataSet();
}
}
internal class SQLExpressDataBase : IDataBase
{
public DataSet GetData()
{
return new DataSet();
}
}
DaveBTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)Visual Basic is not used by normal people so we're not covering it here. (Uncyclopedia)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kevin,
Just looking at your code example. Would I be right in thinking that the using ConnectionStringSettings object in your code is actually in System.Configuration ?
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, there should be a "using System.Configuration" there.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for this code! I've just gotten this working nicely. I was having a few problems at first as I thought that passing in a connection string that included the Provier... info would be enough. I thought it would obtain the provider automatically, so that has required a bit of modification.
I read this and started to become a bit concerned it would be problematic but a quick check of my Machine.config file confirmed that sqlce is already in there and supported.
http://www.devnewsgroups.net/group/microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet/topic33874.aspx[^]
Thanks again,
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to be of help. I can't remember where I saw the original example now. It might have been in the Visual Systems Journal.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
It's certainly a very neat and tidy way of providing support for multiple databases. The code is part of a WPF custom control library that I producing at the moment so it's seriously nice to have this generic method to support DB data.
Thanks again,
|
|
|
|
|
Why not use the Provider patterns? Each connection can be created based on the provider in the connection string - then you can use the standard Db... classes rather than DB specific classes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Pete,
I'm going to have a look into this.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|