|
Posted date ofOneImage[^] article is 1st March 2009.
cheers,
Abhijit
CodeProject MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Na i posted it feb 28 
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
VectorX wrote: Na i posted it feb 28
oh.. I am sorry. But in your article its showing Posted: 1 Mar 2009. When I checked the version its 28Feb.
cheers,
Abhijit
CodeProject MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Probably happened when it was updated from temp to article by an admin.
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
In the intro text "innapropriate" is spelled wrong (extra 'n').
Cheers,
Drew.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Aaaaah. One of those nights!
Cheers,
Drew.
|
|
|
|
|
There may be a way to do this already - but I'm blowed if I can find it.
When I visit a forum I would like to see only messages posted since my last visit - but to see the whole thread of which that thread forms a part.
i.e. show all threads changes since my last visit - expanding the (first, last or all) message(s) withing the thread that have been posted since my last visit - but still showing (unexpanded) all other messages within the thread.
On the same subject, I'm not sure the current filtering is working quite right- I filtered by messages since last visit - and saw tow messages - but there was at lease one other message less than 5 minutes old which did not appear until I changed to show all messages.
So - if I go to this forum right now,m with filter set to 'last day' layout 'normal' I see a post by Hans 31 mins ago, and a reply by Chris 11 mins ago (subject'I got it') (and a few other messages). If I change the filter to 'last visit' I only see Hans' post.
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way to do what you want at the moment, but I'll add it to the TODO
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The killer argument for why we need images in posts: email addresses. That's right, you make an image of your email address, put it in your sig or post, and you don't have to worry about bots and spiders signing you up for all kinds of prurient spam!
|
|
|
|
|
A better way is to have your email address in a table, one cell per character. It's text, can be cut and pasted, and needs no images.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Great idea, however I see a couple of problems:
1. it generates a newline for each new cell and each new row (in FF3, after the copy the clipboard contains an array of strings)
2. how do we fit all the HTML code in the 500-character limit imposed on our sigs?
3. shouldn't we expect bots to catch up on that rather easily?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Luc.
How about an option Convert my sig to image on the member's settings page? That way you (CP) can control the images.
|
|
|
|
|
Just say no to images.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I can tell Chris is weakening on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you picture it in your mind?
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Even better - I felt a disturbance in the Force.
|
|
|
|
|
You're gonna allow tables in sigs? 
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe only platinum members should be able to post images. Size restrictions would, of course, be imposed.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I like that, a better idea would be restricting it to Palladium members.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you mean Plutonium?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope. That could work too, but I specifically picked a platinoid. Osmium would've been a better choice though since until recently it was trading much higher than platinum.
Today's lesson is brought to you by the word "niggardly". Remember kids, don't attribute to racism what can be explained by Scandinavian language roots.
-- Robert Royall
|
|
|
|
|
The voting totals for the c# feb competition arnt adding up correctly to the total responses.
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
Note the text underneath: This is a multiple choice question. Totals may not add up to 100%.
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty much most of the code posted on Code Project is Open Source in one way or another - but is Code Project itself Open Source? If not, are there plans afoot to make it so or do you have good commercial reasons not to make it so?
Just interested... well, not just interested The reason I ask is that there are some really cracker-jack programmers (ie people who aren't me) who post articles and whatnot. I wonder if some of them might want to contribute - in an Open Source way - to the code and perhaps implement features that don't currently exist. Things like a sophisticated automated forum monitoring system that would get rid of the "Plz send me the codez for x" or articles that are just the template and/or don't meet required standards - that kind of thing, or even new features which don't yet exist but when they're put in place, you wonder how you ever managed without them.
print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text
Ain't that Groovy?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
