|
Paul Riley wrote:
Oh come on! You know the plan. Stick a new thread up with a bit more information and we'll all take a look
This a bit too random..... , but try me[^], although I cant gaurentee it will connect (severe bandwidth problems on this side of the world, damn *nix trojans). 2nd last one from the bottom of the page and the first one on the 2nd page, has that problem. Doing a forum suckx bad as you have to make a 1000 posts yourself to see if it works and you dont even get credit for it! OK, admin rights is cool Please ignore the content and note the "author uptime" at the bottom
Paul Riley wrote:
I will get in touch with my guy but I'm trying to get him to figure out why his site is only sending one of my pages at 100 bytes per sec.
Sounds like the same XP problem I am having, it only allows 2 connections
Cheers
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you do criticize him, you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
|
|
|
|
|
leppie wrote:
This a bit too random....., but try me
It took me at least ten minutes to even see the problem, I sure as hell can't see what's causing it. Maybe some temporary table borders would help?
leppie wrote:
Please ignore the content and note the "author uptime"
Corrr! That's a long time
leppie wrote:
Sounds like the same XP problem I am having, it only allows 2 connections
Except this is Win 2K Pro accepting 10 connections and there's only about 10 people know it's there (at least 4 of those won't even be looking!) .
Paul
Life is just a sexually transmitted desease - Matthew Wright (ex-journalist, TV presenter) 10-Oct-02
I finally have a sig! - Paul Riley (part-time deity) 10-Oct-02
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Riley wrote:
Corrr! That's a long time
Maybe you saw it later, but I managed about 33 hours
Paul Riley wrote:
It took me at least ten minutes to even see the problem, I sure as hell can't see what's causing it. Maybe some temporary table borders would help?
Hmm, everything is tables. Maybe it will work. It's not so bad anyways I havent seen it happen again though
Paul Riley wrote:
Except this is Win 2K Pro accepting 10 connections and there's only about 10 people know it's there (at least 4 of those won't even be looking!) .
That should be OK. you can increase to 40 though, but you didnt hear that from me Anyways 10 is better than 2/3 like I have in XP! Meaning when I develop, I need one connection for VS and one for debugging.
Cheers
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you do criticize him, you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
|
|
|
|
|
I forgot to ask...
So what do think so far? The numbering schemes took about 3 days to get it perfect. Didnt realize the post placing would be so difficult, especially when you deal with threads that span longer than the search time (ever noticed that on CP how well the posts are positioned? i wouldnt mind comparing mine to theirs ) . Luckyly the paging fit into my "well-thought-of" scheme so well, it took a whole 5 minutes to implement
Anyway cheers
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you do criticize him, you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Paul:
I tried it the way u said.But still its the same.I created all the datasets on the design time.did the matching of the datasets to the corresponding control in the design page by setting the datasource property.
And all that i really did in the code was get the data from the Dbase and populating the listboxes with them.But still would not work.
Now i shall try commenting out the population one by one and see what happens
Taks and Paul thanks anyows for the help.U folks are great
Pradhip
Why Need Parking lots in Bars when Drunken Driving is Prohibited
|
|
|
|
|
Pradhip wrote:
Taks and Paul thanks anyows for the help.U folks are great
Don't thank us til we get a result. In fact I should thank you... I didn't know those FindBy functions existed for DropDownLists until I read your code; that'll be really useful for me.
So tell me... what is that DataAccessService? Is that something of yours or something I can download?
Paul
Life is just a sexually transmitted desease - Matthew Wright (ex-journalist, TV presenter) 10-Oct-02
I finally have a sig! - Paul Riley (part-time deity) 10-Oct-02
|
|
|
|
|
Oh that's just a COM object we got to do our dataaccess.
Why Need Parking lots in Bars when Drunken Driving is Prohibited
|
|
|
|
|
I had a similar 'problem' recently. I had inadvertently removed the 'onclick' directive on the control. This needs to point at the function/sub that handles the click. I know how you feel - its like the https://sitename:8081/securepage.aspx problem I had - for some reason this won't work. After 4 hours of debug/code change/network sniffing , etc...I finally realized that you cannot specify a port when redirecting to https (by default 443). Stupid cockpit error!!! It's one of those things you can looks at all day and not realize what happened. I hope your problem is the 'onclick'!;)
Cheers, James
|
|
|
|
|
Hi...
Just wanna know it there is a code to give me a dropdown menu list.... like what you will find in "http://www.creative.com". Anyone to help... with any link??
|
|
|
|
|
Try here:
Clickety[^]
Sheesh.. does anyone use Google anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
try www.apycom.com.
these guys ahve some real cool menus and detailed documentation on using them.
Why Need Parking lots in Bars when Drunken Driving is Prohibited
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am wondering which would be beter here..
In the older ASP days I would place any global values that I needed to set into a asp file that would be included at the top of every other page in the system. I could tehn refer to those vars inside the page that they were included in.
I have been playing around with different ways of doign this now that I am getting into the ASP.NET stuff. I notice that I can place variables (and the properties that can get/set them) intothe global.asax file of my site and then refer to them by simply using 'Gloabl.<property_name>'.
Is there any advantage to one way Vs. the other? My thinking is that using the global.asax method might be a bit faster since it does not require a physical file to be read and included as part of the one being displayed. I don't however have any data to back this up.
Being new to the ASP.NET arena I am also wondering how to go about configuring some global functions. I would like to have several functions that would be used at various points int he site and am htinking that the global.asax might be a good way to make them available as well.
While I am on the subject of global things on a web site, what about instances of classes? I was considering creating a class of User that I could us through out the site, but I am at a loss as to where I would creat an instance of it, as well as when I would destroy it. It would be handy to simply create a an instance of it on my login page, then have it worry about user validation to the DB on the backend, returning a property for authenticated or not, but how to I take care of it when the user 'logs off' so to speak.
Thanks for any insight anyone here can provide...
|
|
|
|
|
Ray Cassick wrote:
I was considering creating a class of User that I could us through out the site, but I am at a loss as to where I would creat an instance of it, as well as when I would destroy it.
I was thinking of the same. Although I havent worked with Cookies I think that will be the best option. Then use the variables you stored to recreate a User class for the page on load. Thats sounds like the "logical" way to do it.
Maybe the User instance class can be set as a Session Variable, that could work too I think....So we would retrieve Cookie values at session start make User class, validate with DB , and persist it for the remainder of the session.
I would probably have a look at this over the weekend, so if I find more info I will let you know
Cheers
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you do criticize him, you'll be a mile away and have his shoes.
|
|
|
|
|
No idea which would be the faster way of using global values but I'd imagine Global.asax is the least bug-prone (not relying on you to remember to include it). You can also use a module for things like this.
The same applies to functions.
As for user verification, it's worth SERIOUSLY considering Forms Authentication. Takes all the work out of it for you.
This article[^] is quite a complicated example and it's still a lot more simple than coding a cheap and nasty authentication yourself .
There's a nice explanation of Forms Authentication in O'Reilly's Inside ASP.NET if you have access to Safari.
Paul
Life is just a sexually transmitted desease - Matthew Wright (ex-journalist, TV presenter) 10-Oct-02
I finally have a sig! - Paul Riley (part-time deity) 10-Oct-02
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Riley wrote:
You can also use a module for things like this.
I was going to consider this. If I create a module, doe sit matter where I create it? Can I assume that puting it in any directory is ok as long as I make the functions that it contains public?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see why it wouldn't work if it's in the same application as the calling page somewhere. I've only ever used a module where all my pages are in one folder, so don't quote me on that, but so long as it's in the right namespace it should be fine. Even if it's not, you can probably reference it.
Paul
Life is just a sexually transmitted desease - Matthew Wright (ex-journalist, TV presenter) 10-Oct-02
I finally have a sig! - Paul Riley (part-time deity) 10-Oct-02
|
|
|
|
|
does anyone know of anything i can do [rituals, chanting, electric shock] that will help me come up with a new website design? how do u lot get inspiration?
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't say your changing your own site. It's very cool as it is.
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
Brian Delahunty wrote:
Please don't say your changing your own site. It's very cool as it is.
well.....ummm......actually......i am
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Nnamdi Onyeyiri wrote:
well.....ummm......actually......i am
Well.... ummmm... why???
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
well......umm......i got sick of the old design
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose. Thats a good enough reason. So.. Any ideas for the new one?
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|
|
only one, but i dont really like it. and browsing the net doesnt help, it only makes me hate my ideas even more
1001111111011101111100111100101011110011110100101110010011010010 Sonork | 100.21142 | TheEclypse
|
|
|
|
|
I really should get around to finishing my site.. Well. I'd have to get around to starting it first I suppose.
Regards,
Brian Dela
|
|
|
|