|
try checking var.vt for VT_NULL (and VT_EMPTY possibly)
maXallion "Is there any Tea on this Spaceship?" - Arthur Dent
Home of The Code Devil
|
|
|
|
|
it works, but probably what i have done is NOT the best coding example
CString sGroupID;
variant_t vTest;
variant_t vGroupID;
vTest.ChangeType (VT_NULL);
vGroupID = rsMenu->Fields->GetItem (_variant_t ("group_id"))->Value;
if (vGroupID != vTest)
{
vGroupID.ChangeType (VT_BSTR);
sGroupID = vGroupID.bstrVal;
}
else
sGroupID = "NULL";
thank you
|
|
|
|
|
that should do the job:
CString sGroupID;
_variant_t vGroupID;
vGroupID = rsMenu->Fields->GetItem (_variant_t ("group_id"))->Value;
if (vGroupID.vt != VT_NULL)
sGroupID = (LPCTSTR)_bstr_t(vGroupID);
else
sGroupID = "NULL";
maXallion "Is there any Tea on this Spaceship?" - Arthur Dent
Home of The Code Devil
|
|
|
|
|
I wanna run exe file from another software that i code in VC++...I can run int using WinExec.......But i need to know how to use CreateProcess or ShellExcute function...
Plz someone....
THANX
|
|
|
|
|
Here's some sample code, perhaps it helps:
(havn't tested it, though)
STARTUPINFO supi;
PROCESS_INFORMATION proci;
GetStartupInfo (&supi); supi.lpDesktop = "";
CString strCmd = "notepad.exe";
BOOL bOK = CreateProcess(NULL,strCmd.LockBuffer(),NULL,NULL,
FALSE,CREATE_DEFAULT_ERROR_MODE | NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS,
NULL,NULL,&supi,&proci);
WaitForSingleObject(m_hProcess,INFINITE); //wait until the program is closed
maXallion "Is there any Tea on this Spaceship?" - Arthur Dent
Home of The Code Devil
|
|
|
|
|
thanx u very much......I need to know how WaitForSingleObject works.......When i include this function, there is no difference...
|
|
|
|
|
thanx u very much......I need to know how WaitForSingleObject works.......When i include this function, there is no difference...
|
|
|
|
|
How can i check whether user can pree ctrl key
Dinesh Asanka
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean can they press it, or have they pressed it ? If the latter, GetASyncKeyState(VK_CONTROL)
Christian
#include "std_disclaimer.h"
People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made.
The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean can they press it, or have they pressed it ? If the latter, GetASyncKeyState(VK_CONTROL)
Christian
#include "std_disclaimer.h"
People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made.
The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to use the grid control in a CFormView-based class, by inserting a custom control in the dialog. My application fails with "Failed to create empty document" message at startup, the trace information from a debug run is as follows:
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_GETMINMAXINFO (0x0000, 0x0012F9FC)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_NCCREATE (0x0000, 0x0012F9D0)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_NCCALCSIZE (0x0000, 0x0012FA1C)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_CREATE (0x0000, 0x0012F9BC)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_NCCREATE (0x0000, 0x0012F394)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_NCCALCSIZE (0x0000, 0x0012F3C4)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_CREATE (0x0000, 0x0012F394)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_SIZE (0x0000, 0x014501E0)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = 0x0368 (0x0000, 0x0012F0E4)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_MOVE (0x0000, 0x00000000)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_PARENTNOTIFY (0x0001, 0x002D02FE)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_SETFONT (0x500A043F, 0x00000000)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_PARENTNOTIFY (0x0002, 0x002D02FE)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_DESTROY (0x0000, 0x00000000)
WndProc: hwnd=0x2D02FE, msg = WM_NCDESTROY (0x0000, 0x00000000)
Warning: could not create view for frame.
Failed to create client pane/view for frame.
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_DESTROY (0x0000, 0x00000000)
WndProc: hwnd=0x4C03D6, msg = WM_NCDESTROY (0x0000, 0x00000000)
Warning: Window creation failed: GetLastError returns 0x00000000
Warning: failed to create CFrameWnd.
Warning: CDocTemplate couldn't create a frame.
The thread 0x4C4 has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program 'D:\TEMP\gctest\Debug\gctest.exe' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The first warning is caused by ::CreateDialogIndirect() failing when the CMainFrame is being created. Then everything else fails because there is no main window.
Any idea why the window creation fails? Is some additional initialization needed?
|
|
|
|
|
hi..if u wanna use gridcontrol... use active X.....Add dbgrid control and ado to your project......assign ado topo a recordsource......\
Set SQL in ado... Call the the id of ado from the dbgrid control......Add table and recordset u wanna call in dbgrid.....
These thing can be done in resource workshop that is in something.rc file....No need to code anything in the CMainFrm......
Ur problem occurs becoz another program might have running the recorsource at the sametime....
"LIFE IS AN ADVENTURE THAT SHOULD BE LIVED.... LOVE IS A PROBLEM THAT SHOULD SOLVED...LOVE YOUR LIFE!!"
CVASIVA
|
|
|
|
|
I guess I should have specified that I am trying to use Chris Maunder's MFC Grid Control 2.22, not an ActiveX component. I need a control with checkboxes and date pickers as cells.
Anyway, I solved the first problem myself, I had to include a member variable for the control in the view class (not mentioned in the documentation). But the control still doesn't work, in fact it doesn't appear at all on the dialog. Debugging shows that the control's Create() function isn't called.
Isn't the MFC framework supposed to Create() all the controls defined in the dialog template? If I must Create() the control myself, how do I access the control position and size information defined in the dialog editor?
|
|
|
|
|
> Isn't the MFC framework supposed to Create() all the controls
> defined in the dialog template?
Only if you add the corresponding call to DDX_Control in DoDataExchange.
Tomasz Sowinski -- http://www.shooltz.com.pl
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, this was just the information I needed
|
|
|
|
|
Try EasyGrid ActiveX as a substitute.
It must will be very helpful.
Download is available @
http://www.share2.com/easygrid/
|
|
|
|
|
Hi y'all!
I've got myself into a nasty situation again. I had to create a client and server application which would be put on different PC's and communicate using simple modems (analogue and ISDN).
Not having a good component for serial communication and having to build a protocol of our own on top of it, I used the MSComm ActiveX object in Visual C++ 6 (with Win2K SDK) for talking with the modems on the COM ports.
But when we started stress testing it, it turned out that the client suffered from a rather huge memory leak, and it wasn't in my code! (I'm sure of this, because a debug build doesn't dump any memory and the only thing that keeps on rising is the number of used CRT-blocks). The weird thing is that the server application uses the MSComm object almost in the same way and doesn't have this leak at all.
When continually connecting and talking to each other the client application rises about 20 Kb each minute, so within an hour or 8 the Client PC will be swapping like crazy.
The ONLY difference between the two programs is that the server application is the dialing party and the client application is the waiting party.
Anyone ever had the same problem??? I think there must be some difference in the order of function calls. Could this really be of any difference???
Structured programming vs. chaotic mind boggling
|
|
|
|
|
If you are using a VARIANT to read in data, are you clearing the variant when you are done with it?
cve
|
|
|
|
|
I use COleVariants which should do the trick:
// --- Code for reading ---
COleVariant vInput = m_pMSCOMM->GetInput();
CString sBuffer = vInput.bstrVal;
// --- Code for writing ---
COleVariant vSend = sMessage;
m_pMSCOMM->SetOutput( vSend );
Anyway, the same code is used for client and server and the server doesn't show ANY problems. If I use the VARIANTs in the wrong way, please tell me how to do it right.
Structured programming vs. chaotic mind boggling
|
|
|
|
|
Hello all!!
I've figured out where my memory leak was! It was the way I took the variant out of the GetInput function. Since I've never really been a VB fan I never liked variants anyway, but now I'm truly scared of them
The code that I used was wrong:
COleVariant var = MSComm1.GetInput();
This code leaves another copy of the variant hanging around inside the memory space of the MSComm object. If your client receives the content of several files, this means a lot of leaking memory.
The solution is as follows:
COleVariant var.Attach (MSComm1.GetInput());
This code explicitly tells the ActiveX component that we want to read the variant type and delete it from the COM-memory space...
Have fun!
Structured programming vs. chaotic mind boggling
|
|
|
|
|
I am having an object inherited from abstract base class (having some pure virtual functions).
My problem is this:
I create some objects of that type by calling new, and when I later call delete on them destructor is not being called! Destructor is simple (public, not virtual).
Is there any open bug in Visual C++ compiler regarding this ?
Miroslav Rajcic
http://www.spacetide.com
|
|
|
|
|
Which destructor? If you are talking about the base-class destructor, this is a classic one. The destructor must be virtual
|
|
|
|
|
Both base class destructor and inherited class destructor are plain public.
So, do you say that I must convert one of them to virtual?
Miroslav Rajcic
http://www.spacetide.com
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely - your base class destructor must be virtual. This is how, for example, the designers of the string class stopped people deriving from it, they didn't make the destructor virtual.
Christian
#include "std_disclaimer.h"
People who love sausage and respect the law should never watch either one being made.
The things that come to those who wait are usually the things left by those who got there first.
|
|
|
|
|
I tried your tip and it works now
I have declared base class destructor as virtual.
Thanks again.
Miroslav Rajcic
http://www.spacetide.com
|
|
|
|