|
I'n curious why we should use > at all; it seems to me using < instead of < is quite sufficient, > isn't anything special without a preceding <
Which also means we do not really need the > widget, my guess is it exists only to avoid someone wondering about it if it weren't there.
|
|
|
|
|
yes there is some inconsistency: in my experience when a letter follows the < it is considered a potential HTML tag and gets eaten, whereas spaces, digits, equal signs and other special symbols that could not possibly result in a valid HTML tag are left unmodified.
An acceptable fix seems to be: include a space after the <
|
|
|
|
|
<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx">http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx</a>[<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/LogOn.aspx?rp=%2fscript%2fMembership%2fLogOn.aspx%3frp%3d%252fscript%252fMembership%252fLogOn.aspx%253frp%253d%25252findex.aspx" target="_blank" title="New Window">^</a>]
As you can see when i click sign in button at the top, that page is using the rp(requested page something like this) querystring. But if i enter the wrong password (i didnt try the email but i think that should same) rp querystring is getting more longer. If i click 10 times it should like 20-30 lines in here...
fyi
|
|
|
|
|
And also this is not group account but my image is showng me group now. I changed my account type one time from settings and changed to member again. Is there any communicate problem settings between forums
|
|
|
|
|
Your account had been setup as a group. I've fixed that
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is that a subtle hint that we need to optimise this a little?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, i couldnt find a good solution. But i think its better(may be not ) than rawurl:
Request.Path.Replace(Request.ApplicationPath, "")
As you see we cannot keep the querystrings in here. It just keeps the last page.
If you want to take back again your querystrings, you should write a new method for rp.
Im working on same problem in my project
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pop-up messagebox is related to a user's question[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
As the title says... suggestion is for some kind of last online/last post date (or whatever's more convenient for you to implement) in the display section of who's who... ie: member since 1/1/1900, last online 2/1/1900.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure I like this idea. Do we really need to turn CP into Facebook/MySpace? Seems like an invasion of privacy. Although, you can almost infer that information from the Reputation graph (points are added for logging on on any given day). And as far as last post date, you can look at the member's "Messages Posted" page. The message listed at the top will be the most recent post (the date is shown by it).
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: Seems like an invasion of privacy.
No more so than allowing me to see your profile or your messages posted anyway... would just save me having to click into each profile to see it...
|
|
|
|
|
_Damian S_ wrote: No more so than allowing me to see your profile or your messages posted anyway
What you see on my profile is what I have chosen to let you see (for example, I have a picture of Wikipedia rather than my own mugshot). And with messages posted, you could only see the date of my last message posted; that information is available freely to anybody who happens to notice when you posted that message anyway. It's last login date that seems a little excessive to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Am I usually not feisty? Have you been watching me? Are you stalking me?
Definitely don't give this person the ability to see when I've last logged on! (although the answer is invariably "today")
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: Am I usually not feisty?
It comes and goes...
aspdotnetdev wrote: Have you been watching me?
Why do you ask? Have you seen me?
aspdotnetdev wrote: Are you stalking me?
Shhhhhhhhhh... You're giving the game away...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not keen on it for the same reasons as aspdotnetdev. However, I'll let the community decide via votes.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
No worries... was just a thought... it may have been lonely... rofl...
Personally I think it would be interesting, as there are a gazillion users, many of whom you never hear from... are they lurking, or just not around any more???
|
|
|
|
|
_Damian S_ wrote: are they lurking, or just not around any more
Seems like their choice to not tell you that. Speaking of choice, wouldn't be a terrible idea to add this as an optional feature. Meaning it can be turned on and off. Probably would want it off by default.
|
|
|
|
|
You could save one mouse click by showing an extra field : Last Message Posted on 11/15/2009
But I am against showing the Last Activity Time since that is definitely a privacy issue there.
|
|
|
|
|
I realize that I may be speaking for just a few abandoned, orphan programmers here, but it would be GREAT if this site included a category and/or filter for articles that used only Win32 API calls instead of MFC, ATL, .NET or other things like that. Believe it or not, there are still people out here who write in C (not C++, C# or any of those new fangled languages, although we might need to mix in some FORTRAN from time to time).
There are precious few resources available for folks like me and I think that The Code Project would be a great (and logical) place to find "plain" Win32 API example code. If I'm alone, well, so be it -- just ignore me. If I'm not, then maybe, with enough support, the folks running this site might help us out by creating the necessary categories, filters, and whatnot for articles that use C, only the Win32 API, GDI, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I still write some code at this level on occasion, but if I had a question I would use the C/C++/MFC++ forum to post it. Most developers who use C++ and/or MFC will have enough knowledge to answer the sort of question you allude to.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking more about the library of articles and code examples. When searching for articles, there is no option to filter for "pure" Win32 API, so we C programmers can only try to glean what we know from other examples and work backwards to the APIs themselves. A very simple example of Win32 API articles would be those found at http://www.winapizone.net/tutorials/winapi/[^].
I won't try to plead my case any more than this, I just figured it wouldn't hurt to post the suggestion to see if there was anyone else interested in the same thing. If not, I'm no worse off than I am already... <smile>
|
|
|
|
|
My apologies, I did not read the title properly. Yes, I agree your request is quite reasonable, and I'm sure would help others, especially beginners in C or Windows programming.
|
|
|
|