|
There is 2009, should be 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Oopsie daisy. Thanks Petr! Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
The title's are correct now but in the description there is still 2009
This is the voting form for the Best ASP.NET article of January 2009 competition. Below are a list of the top 10 articles submitted last month. Please choose the ones you consider your favourite. Remember - you can only vote once!
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed! Should be good until next year. Hopefully at that time we'll get it right. Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
we can always just pretend it's still 2009 and throw a huge party
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
bahar3 [^] troll is spamming the C# forum (and, I suspect, he is also surreptitiously enriching uranium ).
Please ban him.If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
And this guy[^] is encouraginging him/her. I suspect the first one is sima3(?) who was kicked off two days ago. MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate. It is very irritating!! Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
The forum looks really messed up. I browsed through the first few pages to see if there's any interesting query, and all I see is this nonsense!
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
Agreed. It just does not look good.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
The home page lists some survey's for best article's of January 2009 ?
Shouldn't that be 2010?
The description also says 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
I already posted it two posts below this one.
Here ^[^]"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
Awch that will teach me to post before reading
|
|
|
|
|
"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
It will be nice to add a "Most popular news" section in the weekly newsletter. If you can't explain something to a six year old, you really don't understand it yourself. (Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent idea. I'll add it to the TODO cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I signed up for CP twice from the same email, Yes I did and I don't know hwo this happened and I know it shouldn't allow me to do it but it did.
The problem is with the newsletters I got, the emails that goes to my email for the newsletter or any thing that CP send it to my email, they send 2 copies of the same email.
So my bug is it send 2 email of the same subject to my email. How can I stop this and only receive one email of the newsletter?
If you need more information about my problem please feel free to ask me.
|
|
|
|
|
There is only 1 account in our system with your email address. If you are getting two emails then
1. please check your mail client to ensure you aren't forwarding yourself the email
2. Check at the bottom of each mail to see what address the email is actually being sent to. You may find that you've actually signed up with a different address.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Don't feed the trolls Harvey Saayman - South Africa
Software Developer
.Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)
1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111
|
|
|
|
|
On home page under LATEST SURVEYS we have different link as:
Best ASP.NET article of January 2009
Best VB.NET article of January 2009 etc. etc.
Shouldn't that be
Best VB.NET article of January 2010
Best VB.NET article of January 2010
??
Am I missing something? "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
modified on Wednesday, February 10, 2010 2:08 AM
|
|
|
|
|
One problem is that ASP.Net can use C# as well, so NO it should not read;
Best VB.NET article of January 2010
|
|
|
|
|
My point is not about C# or VB.NET. What I want to say is this is year 2010. So instead of January 2009, shouldn't it be January 2010?? "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
Nilesh Hapse wrote: So instead of January 2009, shouldn't it be January 2010
That part should yes.
|
|
|
|