|
I suggest you use "Total" everywhere the sum of the seven rep components is used, including in the rep graph legend. And please add the total to the Who's Who page too, as an eight block.
Tom Deketelaere: Total 8,624
Authority 4,721 Editor 24
|
|
|
|
|
John's already put in his request. It's cooking now. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have:
Posted 2 hours ago
Sandeep Mewara 8,235
Authority 6,801 Editor 338
It should be 12715
Author: 4480
=================
12715-4480 = 8235
=================
|
|
|
|
|
Can you send a screenshot please? I see
Posted 2 hours ago
Sandeep Mewara 12,716cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Dropped an email with attachment at "webmaster@codeproject.com"
If you need me to send it at some other id, please share across.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for that - I'll dive in and see what the issue is. Tom's also sent me one which will help.
I was away from the computer this afternoon, unfortunately, but Matthew (one of our team) had a quick look and has some suggestions. I'm just about to crack a good bottle of red and dive in and get this sorted out.
Again, apologies for this being such a drawn out drama.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
That's weird I still see the 3903 number
Sending you screenshot now
|
|
|
|
|
you're in for a "hit CTRL/F5" reply now.
|
|
|
|
|
Been there done that (multiple times )
Even switched pc's
Even try ed it on IE7 and FF now nothing helps.
|
|
|
|
|
same results with me...
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent - thanks Tom. I got one from Sandeep too so I'll dive in and get this sorted out.
Sorry about the hassle.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Sorry about the hassle.
No problem, I think you have one of the few site's where everyone (or almost everyone) understand the difficulty with bugs from time to time
|
|
|
|
|
Found the problem but it will require a full upload of the code to fix, so I'm holding off until tomorrow afternoon when things quite down a little. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know if this is a bug or intentional.
And I'm not complaining but the top banner seems to be stuck at the devexpress add.
Everywhere I go on the site I get the same add.
Just thought you might want to know (if it isn't intentional)
|
|
|
|
|
They took a dip and is fluctating a lot... just in case any specific reason we should know?
|
|
|
|
|
Did the criteria change, or are the numbers actually correct now? (I lost 150 points, that's why I'm asking).
Silver lining - the profile page matches the graph. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
In one of the responses, Chirs told that data at two places are a cached copy of same thing (Earlier there was a SQL script error thats why the difference was there!). Looks like the SQL script error has been rectified and now both are in perfect SYNC.
In another response of his, he told he is working on it right now(and CP has all the previous data)
Might be now they will work on that.
step-by-step !
|
|
|
|
|
Some points (sign-in) are missing. Just working on tidying them up now. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
As per the FAQ "A member receives points for up-voting another member's message."
I just gave someone 5 points on the Lounge but did not get any points - seems to be a bug.
I hope this one is not going to be removed. I kind of like getting a point when I give someone a 4 or a 5.
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you look at your own profile the values may be cached. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
A sophisticated 21st century site should helpfully inform you if it thinks it's a possible re-post automatically.
Search has *always* been the "Achilles heel" of this site and I've always found it annoying how people whine about "re-post" when in fact it's difficult to find if anything has been posted before and the search results are not ordered correctly to facilitate searching for re-posts. Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better.
- Poul Anderson
|
|
|
|
|
Searching is ordered by relevancy weighted by rating.
How should search results be ordered in order to facilitate better searches for reposts?cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
For the most common repost type, a link to foo, an automated check indicating that foo has been posted before at [link(s) to previous post(s)] and asking if you want to repost it would be a good start. I'd lean towards making this ajaxy instead of loading a confirm page when clicking post to keep it from being overly annoying. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
This would require an exact or very close match to be found.
What sort of threshold would be appropriate:
1. exact wording of a message only
2. If all words in posted message already posted then flag
3. Just show search results based on what was posted
In any of these cases it's a very expensive operation. Do we
1. Do it only for short messages
2. Do it only if a message is of type "news"
3. Suck it up and deal with it.
How do we deal with "me too" and LOL replies? They will cause a lot of false positives.cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|