|
Dalek Dave wrote: point added for the first post of the day on the participant total
What if you login, don't post a message, hang around, read a few articles and log out?
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
modified on Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Abhinav S wrote: don't post a message
Theoretically possible, however, not very DD-like.
|
|
|
|
|
"Signing in, for instance, means..." can be found in the latest, much improved, rep FAQ.
|
|
|
|
|
I autoconnect as well and for me the point gets added at about 3pm local time (midnight in Ontario).
|
|
|
|
|
Rod Kemp wrote: I autoconnect as well and for me the point gets added at about 3pm local time (midnight in Ontario).
I always thought login points might have something to do with it being 12:00 AM in Ontario
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I only noticed when exactly the other day.
Until CP introduces IP based geolocation it makes sense that the "day" used for login points would be standardised on a single location, in this case the data center.
|
|
|
|
|
GMT is the usual global time.
As it is a global site, perhaps Zulu should be adopted.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Nope you don't need to sign in and out each day. We only limit this event from occurring more than once per day for any particular member. However, if you have an active session across two days we would not record two sign-ins. Though I doubt anyone is really that involved with the site.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, I'd like one of my programs to access a person's personal page on CP through his user ID.
IIRC the user ID used to be the normal way to link a Who's Who list to a personal page, something like
http:
but then some time ago you have changed the Who's Who listings to use the friendly names.
The mid approach still works most of the time, e.g. it works well when typed in tbe browser's address box. However it typically fails (over 60%) when executing a Process.Start(url) and the default browser (FF3.0 on my Vista system) isn't running yet. It typically succeeds (say 90% of the time) when the browser is already running. Same when IE7 is default browser.
As a minor issue, having very short userID numbers (such as 1) makes it fail even inside the browser; prefixing some zeroes solves that one though.
When it doesn't work, what I get is a CP page saying:
Welcome to the Code Project
Your place for free C++, C# and .NET articles, code snippets, discussions, news and the best bunch of developers on the net.
Page Not Found
Unfortunately the page, image or download you are looking for is not on our servers. Can you please recheck your URL or try searching again from our homepage.
I'm a bit puzzled here; could you please help me out. My next article depends on it.
TIA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much. That works just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for catching this!
This is the correct link for that page:
Checking the serial Number of a CD[^]
And I have fixed it in that article as well
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a time frame for getting
0) a vote tally - how many votes of each value have been cast (like we get on our articles)
1) A "My vote of 1 (or 2)" (like we get on our articles)
2) The ability to vote on our own tip (again, like we can do on our articles)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Saturday, March 20, 2010 8:42 AM
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: 0) a vote tally - how many votes of each value have been cast
The reason we don't show this is to keep the UI clean and minimal. We do show at the time of vote, however. Do you think it'd be useful to have it always visible?
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: 1) A "My vote of 1 (or 2)"
We have a very high priority item to not allow down-voting without comments for questions, answers and tips/tricks. Meaning likely within the next couple weeks.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: 2) The ability to vote on our own tip
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
0) Got an idea on how to do this neatly. Stay tuned.
1) Done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can we *please* get the ability to optionally turn on email notification when someone votes on one of our articles, tips/tricks, and blog entries. This setting would be either in our profile (best choice) or in the article and tip submission wizards.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Just a notice that a vote has been cast? We can't send an email saying *who* voted.
What about if you post an article and 100 people suddenly vote for it? Wouldn't that be, well, kinda annoying?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Just a notice that a vote has been cast?
Yeah, just that a vote was cast. I know you won't say who voted.
Chris Maunder wrote: What about if you post an article and 100 people suddenly vote for it? Wouldn't that be, well, kinda annoying?
Well, it would be an opt-in thing. By default it would be off, and I assume they would always be able to turn it off later.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like 8 points are being deducted if a message or answer is downvoted. Is this correct?
Atleast does not match with Reputation FAQ's!
|
|
|
|
|
Points are weighted by member level.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok! That was what i thought of, just wanted to get confirmed. Not sure, if this needs a mention in FAQ to avoid any confusion. What say?
|
|
|
|
|
Yup.. we'll add it to the FAQ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In that page, Minimum Score dropdownlist contains Scores "1, 2, 3, 4, 5" & i want scores "1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5" too. It will be fine for filtering search small range(ex. Displaying updates based on ratings between 4.5 and 5). thanks
|
|
|
|