|
Sean Ewington wrote: Are you sure? What about this little guy?
Build Your Own NAS Device[^]
Not sure about that - maybe he didn't pick a sub-section for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - "Hardware". Could be a site bug (or one that was around when I originally posted the article).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTW... nice game!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any functionality on CP that allows us to share files privately between users?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
maybe you could create a collaborative unfinished article, and upload/download some ZIP files to/from it? I'd expect all co-authors would be able to access the files.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - that worked well the last time I tried it.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
but this time I added a little twist: you name the team members explicitly, by making them co-authors. I've never done that, but if it doesn't do what you want, how could people co-author an article at all?
|
|
|
|
|
That might work, but then I'd have another article that I can't delete.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I just remembered, there is also a "collaborative group" account, which I would guess is a single account shared by several people. You'd have to create one for each combination of people you're interested in. Again, not from my own experience.
BTW: don't modify your regular account, I remember some problems were reported when you change its type.
PS: If you care for an experiment, I'm willing to help out.
|
|
|
|
|
There is the 'Uploads' system that is in place for platinum members (see top right, next to 'Sign out' - if it's not there then I can open that up a little)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can other users download from your uploads?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I uploaded a kitten image the other day, see here[^].
And I just uploaded a ZIP for your experimental purposes, see here: "/script/Membership/Uploads/648011/JSOPtest.zip"
BTW: as these are my uploads I expect you can download/read/use them (assuming you know the exact URL), but not modify/delete them. So it may not be the perfect solution for real collaboration.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. the purpose of uploads is specifically to give you a place to share files.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh - perfect then.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Not visible to me!
|
|
|
|
|
Is that supposed to be all platinum members or only those who are platinum in on topic areas? I've only got it for debater/organizer.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know, I suddenly had an "Uploads" menu (in between "My Articles" and "Sign Out"). I don't know what triggered it, my best guess is Golden Authorship. I wish CP would make such things public, the rep FAQ would be a nice place to collect descriptions of the rep color consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
It's for authors only at the moment.
It's an old, oooold system that was never designed for mass use. However, there's a need, so I'm going to add a general improvement item to the TODO.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
I was browing the site and came across this article:
Write Templates for Visual Studio 2010[^]
At first glance the article appears to be complete garbage. But after watching the videos I realized there was alot of useful information within the article in video format. It would be great if I could watch those videos without having to leave the site. You guys are way behind on this and should upgrade the website to include embedded flash video options for authors.
I did a little research and came across this:
Add Silverlight video to your articles[^]
Unfortunately I could not find any information regarding embedding Flash videos... which is currently dominating vector animation/media delivery in the browser market. Is this something you guys have considered?
Anyway... HTML5 will be standardized in a few years and will include a <video> tag. I am hoping to be able to watch videos in future codeproject.com articles.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we definitely encourage Flash videos in our articles. In the article editor, 2nd row, 2nd icon, is a 'movie' button that allows you to enter Flash movies into your articles.
It's not currently working for Silverlight, but we have that as a known bug and will fix it as soon as we can get to it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
1. Write message
2. Uncheck 'Use HTML in this post'
3. Post it
4. Edit that message
5. Check 'Use HTML in this post'
6. Update/Post it
on 6th step it should remember 'Use HTML in this post' as checked but no it doesn't. So now when you will write a new message you will find 'Use HTML in this post' still unchecked which suppose to be checked.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
you can change the default settings of those checkboxes on your settings page[^] (forum tab).
you can also change them on the edit page of a new message, not on the edit page when editing a message; yes it is confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: not on the edit page when editing a message
yes but why not ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen W.K. wrote: on 6th step it should remember 'Use HTML in this post'
The feeling from some of the other members who discussed this - and ultimately led to it's current form - is that if you go back and edit an old message that was posted with a setting different from your standard setting then it should not then perpetuate that change to all your new postings.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|