|
Roger Wright wrote:
an updated driver for my video card
I will be happy if this is/was the problem....
Roger Wright wrote:
Tell me more about your hardware
To b frank, I really havent opened the box, as my win-2k itself provided its video/sound/modem driver - all onboard cards. Will have a look at the box, and then try to get a new driver.......
Roger Wright wrote:
the compatibility registry
Will check that also.... I guess there is no problem in this aspect.
Roger Wright wrote:
128 MB is plenty of RAM for Win2K
I said that for running XP. Believe it or not, I had a PC... Celeron-366Mhz-64MB ram... I now upgraded that to PIII-866Mhz-128MB ram.... And thats giving me problem now.....
Thanks....
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote:
an updated driver for my video card
My video card is SIS-6326.. and I installed the driver for the same from the CD. I still have problem?? Can u help me still???
Will give the info that has got logged in the events...
The computer has rebooted from a bugcheck. The bugcheck was: 0x0000009c (0x00000001, 0x00000000, 0xb2000000, 0x00000115). Microsoft Windows 2000 [v15.2195]. A dump was saved in: C:\WINNT\Minidump\Mini120702-01.dmp.
was the message logged after I rebooted!!!
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
SiS video cards are very common, and are generally a pain in the a&&. Have you checked Technet for clues about this particular error? Alternatively, have you tried doing a step-by-step boot, eliminating drivers one by one? I know it's tedious, but often it's the only way to isolate boot problems. In this case, though, the error seems to be a hardware failure - see this[^] article, for starters.
"How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote:
step-by-step boot
U mean the F8 key during bootup??
The mictrosoft link gave nothing useful for me to 'solve' my problem!!!
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, a "no-problem" installation of Windows NT requires to be in the 1st 8Gb (practically, in the first 7182 Mb - don't ask...). I don't know what is the behaviour of NT installation having a FAT32 partition - since NT does not recognize it, i'd try to get rid of it - but try to find more on http://www.ntfaq.com/ - there are plenty of informations about install, maybe you can find something useful for your particular configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
Cristian `Sardaukar` Amarie wrote:
http://www.ntfaq.com/
Thanks for the link....
Cristian `Sardaukar` Amarie wrote:
8Gb
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
I was just wondering is there any good web sites for explaining how to create a dual boot system under Windows 98
thanks
Stephen
|
|
|
|
|
ballyduff wrote:
dual boot system under Windows 98
What r the OS you wanna dual boot with win 98.
For your info, win-95 cannot co-exist with win-98 for dual boot. Similarly... win-NT and win-2000 doesnt co-exist...
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
I was thinking of putting on a linux operating system on it Something like SuSE Linux 8.1.
What i want is when i turn on the pc i want to be greeted with an option to either boot into win 98 or linux.
is this possiable?
|
|
|
|
|
Install Linux, and the installation software will take care of setting up dual boot.
|
|
|
|
|
I used to run Debian and W98. You have to install Windows first since it doesn't like to play with other operating systems. Real pain in the ass since I needed to re-install it on a farily regular basis...
I'd wear a miniskirt and pimp myself for an extra ten grand a year. - David Wulff
|
|
|
|
|
ballyduff wrote:
is this possiable?
Hmmm quite a lotsa answers have been posted 4 u....
I guess all are the similar ones and will satisfy u....
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
SPS wrote:
win-NT and win-2000 doesnt co-exist
Actually, all versions of NT will happily install alongside one another. I have three NT installs on this box right now in fact. Just make sure each install has its own partition, or they will write over each other's Program Files dirs.
--Mike--
"Adventure. Excitement. A Jedi craves not these things."
-- Silent Bob
1ClickPicGrabber - Grab & organize pictures from your favorite web pages, with 1 click!
My really out-of-date homepage
Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm
|
|
|
|
|
I have some problems in windows NT... check other message I have posted in this forum please!!
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
The SuSE Linux manuals describe how to do this. Unlike Windows, the product ships with detailed documentation, rather than requiring you to spend hundred$ to buy the information that should be provided with the product. When you install it on a drive that already has Windows installed it will detect the previous installation and offer to install itself in a separate partition. Since I haven't done so yet, I don't know how it will do this without damaging the existing installation... the docs probably give some help there. When I get around to doing this, I plan to have a second drive in the system dedicated just to Linux.
The installation will, however, install a MBR that halts the boot process and offers you a choice of which OS to load. For that reason, it's important that Windows (and any other OS you have on the system) be installed first. I strongly recommend reading the documentation thoroughly before you begin as there are many configuration options to consider that don't come up when installing Windows.
"My child was Inmate of the Month at Mohave County Jail" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City, AZ
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I am looking for information on how to build a home "workstation."
What I would like to have is a single box (dual cpu's?) that has two of everything outside the box (monitor, keyboard, etc.) I know there are video cards that support dual monitors (any suggestions?).
I would need to be able to login independantly on the two monitors (XP will be the O/S), i.e. be able to play a game on one monitor and create a word document while on the other.
Any pointers on how to configure this and suggestions on hardware??
Thanks,
Gary
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
I have win95 installed on my PC. It has been working fine. Today when I reboot the machine efter some initialization I got the
message "Operative system not found". Why I get this message, what has happened to my machine? What I remember is that I did clean the place near the computer which might have caused that some cable gets loose, may this cause the error I get? or there is something else I have to check.
Please help me in this regard.
regards
/rsasalm
|
|
|
|
|
You may well have bumped a cable loose - crack the case open and give them a wiggle. I've seen this message once, when I stupidly forgot to plug in the IDE cable to the drive in a system I was overhauling. You could also have a damaged MBR on the drive, or the drive controller may be loose (if it's separate from the motherboard). Checking the integrity of all internal cables (both ends) and jumpers is a good first step.
"My child was Inmate of the Month at Mohave County Jail" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City, AZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
When running NetMeeting on Win9x to get remote access to the desktop, it's disabled after boot by default (on the PC which is to be controlled remotely). Is there an option to default to enable?
skulls don't kiss a machito [sighist]
|
|
|
|
|
where to get resource meter in w-2000?
nothing in start menu
no add-remove option
no r*.exe into windows
thanks
t!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think Win2K ships with Resource Meter. In its place is the Performance Console, found in Start/Programs/Administrative Tools/Performance. You might also try MSDN - one of the tools in the Resource Kit for Win2K may do the trick.
"My child was Inmate of the Month at Mohave County Jail" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City, AZ
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know of an API that will let me programmatically update records in or MS DNS server?
Thanks
Stephen.
|
|
|
|
|
If it is a w2k box, you can use WMI.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dns/dns_wmi_6lyq.asp
|
|
|
|
|
When I built this Win2K server I accepted all the defaults, not having any clear reason to change anything from the MS recommendations. That included installing DNS and AD, and integrating the two. Since then the system has been plagued by 5774 errors, and the System Event log has to be emptied every few days. I tried for months to find some combination of settings for DNS that would clear up the problem, including every solution found in the KB. None helped in any way.
A few weeks ago I disabled DNS since I don't currently have any clients connected to the machine, and I had hopes that this would also stop the error messages. It hasn't. Today I was again musing over the problem and am wondering if the problem might really lie in AD, and the DNS is merely responding to faults that lie elsewhere. Should I remove DNS from AD? What other unintended consequences will a DNSectomy cause?
"My child was Inmate of the Month at Mohave County Jail" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City, AZ
|
|
|
|