|
|
You are disregarding the forum guidelines in many ways and your question now is unlikely to get any answers. Fix it!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi , have a good day
Is there is any Documentation or Links
that describe or compare the new namespaces and classes In the .net version 2.0 , 3.0 , 3.5
Thank you
I know nothing , I know nothing ...
|
|
|
|
|
Stark DaFixzer wrote: Is there is any Documentation or Links that describe or compare the new namespaces and classes In the .net version 2.0 , 3.0 , 3.5
MSDN[^], there's a link on top that says "other versions" - as 4.0 is in the list too
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much ,
, you have my vote
I know nothing , I know nothing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you
I know nothing , I know nothing ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
thank you
I know nothing , I know nothing ...
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello experts,
I would like to ask some tips and basic function that a Library automation must have beside from the borrowing,returning and searching of books.I am currently working on a library system for a school and wanted to ask some helpful tips on experts here what would make the system more productive.
Any comment, suggestion, tips are kindly appreciated.
Thanks,
DAN
|
|
|
|
|
Unless I misunderstand your question, I would think that asking the people who would use your system might yield better advice, since they are the ones whose productivity would be affected.
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr., P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
Hello experts,
Hi, yup I know the people that will use are the one I should I ask to but I just want to ask for the advice of some experts or just a suggestion about how you have develop your library system that might help for some beginners including me.
Any advice are kindly appreciated.
Thanks,
DAN
|
|
|
|
|
Listen man! The best answer will comes from the users of the system (which you have been told off by the previous thread). No matter what might be suggested by "experts" here or somewhere else, the best functionality request comes from the users, period. you may add something which you or someone else thought is cool, but the end user may not find it necessary or even worst may not use it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Registration of users is required before anyone can check out or return something. Otherwise the system has no idea who checked out what.
Input and maintenance of the what is in the library's collection is required. You can't search for what isn't there.
A security model so that only certain users can do certain things. All users should be able to search, but if all users could mark a book as checked in people would mark it and just keep the book.
There are tons of other things that you would need. You should sit down and write some use cases.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello expert,
Thank you so much for the great tips. It help alot and I also found the missing part of what I must add. I was thinking that there was a missing piece before I start the system and when I found your humble post to help, the registration of user was the missing one. Again thanks for the help,
Goodluck also.
Thanks,
DAN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
How to get API for facebook, twitter and myspace.
these APIs are free or paid.
my requirement:
We are going to make one web application in asp.net with c#.
we need some functionality like:
we have one email id and we need to check that account for this email id exists or not in facebook, twitter and myspace.
if exists then we need email IDs of this user's all friend contacts.
thanks in advance.
You get the best out of others when you give the best of yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a thought. Did you try asking Facebook, Twitter, or MySpace??
|
|
|
|
|
Well all of them bar facebook would probably go "You want to make a spam bot with our services? Get out."
|
|
|
|
|
See here[^].
Just use a search engine the next time.
|
|
|
|
|
hehehe...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a doubt regarding object transfer and the ease of doing it.
An object can be saved or transferred as binary, soap or xml.
An object can be serialized and transferred.
In distributed computing, was there ever an era where objects were transferred
without serialization.
If true, please mention one instance of how it was achieved.
Regards,
NetQuestions
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
to transfer an object you need to serialize (marshal, deflate) it. AFAIK there is no other way of transferring objects.
The transfer itself is done via a channel (cable or air). This channel is like a queue, you have to put bit after bit into the channel to receive them at the other end. So to transfer an object through this channel you have to serialize it.
All technologies I know (RMI, RPC, CORBA ...) work like this.
Have a look at the wikipedia-article for further details about serialization:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialization[^]
Hope this helps you.
Regards
Sebastian
|
|
|
|