|
I few sites said to (in the js file) put the varible in <%= %> these tags but thats not doing any good. Is there some other part needed to this I'm missing. The javascript I'm using is in a file I included in my VS project.
|
|
|
|
|
It will only work if it's in the markup for your page not in a seperate javascript file.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
is there any way at all to get a value from one to the other? Well.. I don't need it to go two ways..
|
|
|
|
|
JavaScript file
function SomeFunction()
{
alert(myVar);
}
ASPX file
<script language='Javascript'>
var myVar = <%= SomeValue %>
</script>
<script src='Javscript.js' />
Code behind
public string SomeValue{ get; set;}
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Forgot to mention I'm working with a WPF app and the html is included with that. How would all this work and be placed in that?
|
|
|
|
|
Forgot? This is a critical piece of information that could have saved us botth a lot of time.
You can't use the <% %> syntax in this situation. There is no ASP.NET engine involved that will parse and render these tags.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Alright, and sorry. By the time I got to this problem I'd already been up most night. Lesson learned.. don't post the help topics when severely lacking sleep..
|
|
|
|
|
I have a string str = "123 abc b1c3 and so on"
i need to get fragments without spaces
string_array[0] = "123"
string_array[1] = "abc"
and so on
How can i do it?
|
|
|
|
|
str.Split(new char[]{' '});
|
|
|
|
|
split uses ' ' as delimiter and if i have more than one space?
|
|
|
|
|
str = str.Replace(" ", " ").Split(new char[]{' '});
|
|
|
|
|
|
works good!
|
|
|
|
|
Or, alternatively...
str = str.Split(new char[] { ' ' }, StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries);
|
|
|
|
|
Normally I just use str.Split(" "); but having seen Ian's response below with the options parameter, I may start using your form - I didn't know RemoveEmptyEntries existed, so I check and ignore them myself.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Use a regular expression. If you want to separate by numbers then use [0-9]{3}, if you want letters, [a-z]{3}, or if you want words \w.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Or... Rive[^]. But Split is all you need fo rthe given data.
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't done .NET programming in a while so I'm not sure what the best approach is for this. I'm using the .NET Framework 4.0 and the BigInteger class. Before the end of my loop, I have:
Array.Resize(ref numbers, numbers_temp.Length);
numbers_temp.CopyTo(numbers, 0); Is there a better approach than this? I have an array of BigInteger that I add and delete numbers from at various times in the loop. Towards the end of my loop, this array grows quite a bit. It seems such a waste to create another array to copy all members from one to the other and then destroy the older one at every loop iteration.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
I use a generic list for this. In the rare case when I need to return a real array I use the ToArray method.
Remember from CS
If you resize a dynamic array a contiguous chunk of unassigned memory has to be found and then the entire array copied over. Thus, a generic list will be more efficient in all cases.
|
|
|
|
|
As in?
List<BigInteger> numbers = new List<BigInteger>(); Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Well, a good way for dynamic arrays is to use the System.Collections.Generic.List<object>; or for keyed stuff a System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<key,object>.
List<int> list = new List<int>();
list.Add(1);
list.Add(3);
list.Add(5);
int[] intArray = list.ToArray();
|
|
|
|
|
|
You could use a List<BigInteger>
Or do what the List does, double the size every time you need more room.
Or, since it seems that numbers_temp is an array, you are already done. Just change numbers to point to numbers_temp and allocate a new numbers_temp array next time.
But you didn't give much information, so maybe I could not properly answer your question.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I'll probably end up using the scaling. My list array increases by roughly a factor of three at each iteration.
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: Or, since it seems that numbers_temp is an array, you are already done. Just change numbers to point to numbers_temp and allocate a new numbers_temp array next time.
BTW, this is what I'm doing. I'm trying to get rid of this.
|
|
|
|