|
1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this is overridden by
1. Those who bookmark should be able to do so privately
2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
hmm. its clash Now,
To whom to believe Author or Audiance ??
Anyway i needed those two things so i asked,
I Know codeproject know better then me.
But I think It is not any confidential thing that one should hide,
|
|
|
|
|
You're spittin' in the wind Kee-moe-sobbie...
Knowing who bookmarked your article is simply pointless, and knowing who voted your article isn't gonna happen because the admins are concerned (and rightfully so) that revenge voting will take place.
Find another cause, because you're not gonna win either of these arguments.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
I am not sure why the OP even had to ask this. 1,2, and 3 votes cannot be cast anonymously anyway. And why does he need to know 4 and 5 voters? Most 4 and 5 voters leave comments anyway indicating their vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: 2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Why? Revenge voting?
Hiren Solanki wrote: 1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
Again, why? What purpose would knowing that Member 123456 bookmarked your article serve?
|
|
|
|
|
Because Member 123456 is a satirical git who deserves a few down votes for his smart-arsyness? 
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
You are true if you think like that,
But my thinking is different.
I want to know Voters Because Vote of Some MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are more important then voters who are newbies to CodeProject.
Vote of MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are important to me, so i want to know that if that person Liked the article.?
And I will not argue about who is bookmarking the article,Just leave that matter.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: I want to know Voters Because Vote of Some MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are more important then voters who are newbies to CodeProject
Why? Just because somebody hasn't been a member of CP for a long time doesn't make their opinion any less worthy. All you will do is scare off voters.
|
|
|
|
|
If that's all you want then individual user data isn't needed. CP weights votes based on membership levels so in theory a more detailed breakout showing votes tallies for each membertype could be provided.
Revenge voting *IS* a major problem though so data that would facilitate it will *NOT* be provided.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Votes are weighted according to the user's status on the site, which itself s based on how they participate. People with higher reputation scores are going to be counted more that people with low reputation scores. For instance, my reputation is higher than the sdite admin's reputation, so my vote actually counts more, and I'm not even a MVP this year.
(Neener, neener, Chris)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
UPDATE Reputation SET Value=Value/2 WHERE Memeber=...
Frustration: Having ultimate power and never being able to exercise it for ones own entertainment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: WHERE Memeber=...
See, even joking around, you're about to make the site less stable... "Memeber"?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe I deliberately misspell column names to confuse dastardly hackers...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I had not considered that possibility. A stroke of genius, if ever I saw one...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: A stroke of genius, if ever I saw one...
A stroke of luck more like! 
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
|
|
|
|
|
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe by the time you spotted the error it would have took several weeks to fix all the places so that's actually the way it's speeled in the DB.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
You mean you've never done that? 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Frustration: Having ultimate power and never being able to exercise it for ones own entertainment.
Who says you can't exercise it?
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: Who says you can't exercise it
The doctor. Apparently Chris sprained it.
|
|
|
|
|
When I tried to post a reply to this message, the textbox would just be emptied (i.e., it would stay on the message composition page). Looks like there might have been a postback. I tried a few times and it only worked once. I was just able to post in the Lounge too. And if this message goes through, then I guess that means I can post new messages but not replies to that message.
|
|
|
|
|
+1
This happened to me yesterday (starting sometime after noon central time), and then again this morning. I though it was our wonky firewall/network, but now I'm not so sure.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
After I wrote this message and clicked "Post Message", I got a blank page. The message did not post and I had to post it again (luckily, I always copy the text before I post long messages).
Then again, when I tried to post this message, I got the blank page and had to post again. But this time, I viewed the source and was able to copy the HTML for it, which was this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type></HEAD>
<BODY></BODY></HTML>
Pretty empty. Seems like taking a long time to post a message causes this. Perhaps there's something timing out. Maybe I should get a message that informs me something timed out. It would also be nice if it saved my message for me so I could copy it and paste it into a new message.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like the person I was replying to was having the same blank page issue. Read about that here.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
