|
Hi there,
I am trying to insert and image in an article that i m writing for codeproject but i felt difficulty to do that.
Please make good editor, may many people just avoid to write on codeproject because of your word editor.
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Just follow this and you can't go wrong!
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
There is an article editor written by one of the user, can't find a link to it though......
|
|
|
|
|
1.
When you use the Article Wizard, you get a page that allows you to upload files; you could use that for code files (a ZIP holding the sources) as well as image files; it automatically offers you the correct HTML snippet for including each image.
2.
You don't have to create an article inside the wizard's editor, in fact I recommend you create the article on your PC, using local storage, so nothing gets lost when your connection (or the CP site) suddenly breaks down. Use the web-based editor only for final touches!
|
|
|
|
|
If you like, you can use any free HTML editor (such as Visual Web Developer) and email the article with the associated files (images, ZIP's, etc) to Code Project. They'll post the article for you without you ever having to touch their editor.
|
|
|
|
|
I posted this message with a SPAN tag in it (to add a border around some text). It works just dandy. However, when I edit the message, the SPAN tag is mysteriously missing.
|
|
|
|
|
I once had a lot of SPAN tags in an article, the wizard ate them all. Chris is checking all HTML tags he gets, and doesn't like most of them. OTOH some of them are considered OK, as is described here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
That's perfectly fine if it takes out the SPAN tags when it renders the HTML (though, actually, I like my SPANs... don't take them from me!). However, it should not modify the original message so that it is different when I go back in to edit it. Also, the behavior is inconsistent. The first time I post the message, the SPAN stays. If I then edit the message, that is when it disappears (if I were to post that edit, the SPAN would be missing from the rendered HTML too).
|
|
|
|
|
Found and fixed the issue. Upload soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam trap. Removed - thanks
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Are you guys aware that the right-arrows indicating sub menus aren't positioned correctly?
Using IE7 of Vista (and it's the same on FireFox).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I know there's an issue with IE7, but not with FireFox. You've Ctrl+F5 on FF? The CSS update was weeks ago so it should have come through by now, but just in case...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I can replicate on IE8, the > merges into the end of the text on:
Application Lifecycle
C/C++/MFC
IT & Infrastructure
Web Development
Edit: Only with compatability mode ON
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Are you in compatibility mode?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I edited above.
Just tested on FF 3.6.8 and all OK for me.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it too, with IE7. The remarkable thing is "Other Languages" is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps a CSS issue then as that has a different style applied to it?
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
DaveyM69 wrote: Perhaps a CSS issue
I think so. And probably one that can be solved easily.
|
|
|
|
|
For the non-heading entries the difference is that there are CSS rules not being applied. I've been playing around and have an interim (read: dodgy, but better than nothing and I have bigger fish to fry) solution.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this is overridden by
1. Those who bookmark should be able to do so privately
2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
hmm. its clash Now,
To whom to believe Author or Audiance ??
Anyway i needed those two things so i asked,
I Know codeproject know better then me.
But I think It is not any confidential thing that one should hide,
|
|
|
|
|
You're spittin' in the wind Kee-moe-sobbie...
Knowing who bookmarked your article is simply pointless, and knowing who voted your article isn't gonna happen because the admins are concerned (and rightfully so) that revenge voting will take place.
Find another cause, because you're not gonna win either of these arguments.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
I am not sure why the OP even had to ask this. 1,2, and 3 votes cannot be cast anonymously anyway. And why does he need to know 4 and 5 voters? Most 4 and 5 voters leave comments anyway indicating their vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: 2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Why? Revenge voting?
Hiren Solanki wrote: 1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
Again, why? What purpose would knowing that Member 123456 bookmarked your article serve?
|
|
|
|