|
Thanks - fixed in next rev
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I got used to my rep graph missing 10 to 12 points when compared to the numbers on the profile page. Now they match again, without me having noticed a lengthy recalculation. Good one.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Now they match again, without me having noticed a lengthy recalculation
Mine still the same. Discrepency still exists. Thus, I doubt about recalculation...
|
|
|
|
|
My graph is off again by 10 points.
|
|
|
|
|
Question here should be, if there was no re-calculation then how come your points and graph got sorted out earlier?
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know. The rules have changed, yet there wasn't a recalculation.
And JSOP is getting more Author and Org points, others seem not to.
It is all a mystery.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: And JSOP is getting more Author and Org points, others seem not to
I doubt the last part. I got +10 organizer point on bookmarking an article. Try here[^]. Bookmark the artcile, you should get +10 in Org & I should get +10 in Author.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling Coodeer[^] is not behaving in a well formed manner.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
I was just about to post this. I wish I had the powers to nuke'em - I'd be Duke nuke-em.
|
|
|
|
|
Or the Dook of Nooks, aka the Duck of ...
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: the Duck of ...
Nuck? Luck? F...?
"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." (DNA)
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! Squashed
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
In any article, when you see a code block it also shows a 'Collapse' button just above it at right side.
But when you collapse and expand, the text changes to 'Collapse code' and 'Expand code'. In short, when you click on Collapse, the text get appended by ' code'.
Its no big deal but can be fixed.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicely spotted. Fixed in next rev
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't understand why the article count showing wrong.
For more detail please visit the link below:
Articles[^]
Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman
I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.
|
|
|
|
|
For more detail please explain yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like, OP has written 39 articles. The list shows all the 39 but the summary at the top says 36 only!
[Yep! I took the pain of going down the list and count the number!]
|
|
|
|
|
You didn't take enough pain then, your count is wrong. There is something fishy, but it isn't as bad as you claim.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: There is something fishy, but it isn't as bad as you claim
After this, I had to dive more into it! Well, what to say, earlier I counted twice before posting.
So, here is the result of my observation now:
ASP.NET : 2
Office Development: 5
Database: 17
C#: 4
VB.NET: 3
VBScript: 1
.NET Framework: 1
Windows Powershell: 5
Internet Network: 1
============================
Total: 39
============================
This is what I can see right now, as stated earlier.
But then, I have to account your pain too (based on your reply, surely you too went down the list and did a counting! ).
Further, if you are saying so, there must be something for sure and guess what, I did find something more to it:
There are 2 article that are in Composing state. (Probably, since I am a member of mentor group, it is visible to me.)
1 Outlook & 1 of Windows Powershell. Thus, in total 37 published but Summary says 36.
Now, I guess, we must be on same agreement of something fishy but not as bad as I claimed earlier.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no need to count them manually, just use CP Vanity on a member to show and really count his articles, no pain whatsoever. Yes, 37 it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: There is no need to count them manually, just use CP Vanity on a member to show
Oops! My bad ... sorry Luc forgot your app for such kinda thing!
Well, I guess, manual ways won't go so easily
[Update]: BTW, my name does not show up in any kind of list! Based on current filter criterias, I am no where in it.
modified on Monday, October 4, 2010 2:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
depending on the version you use it shows everybody who is on the first 4 or 5 pages of the CP Who's Who, either sorted by article count or by message count. You would need 16+ articles and/or 5000+ messages to appear in the "high achievers".
CP right now does not offer a way to sort people by total reputation which I would use if available. It would probably show you in the top 20 when sorted by total rep. Sorry, there isn't much I can do about it right now, except we are trying to convince Chris to add a Web Service, and one of the features I asked for is getting a partial member list sorted by total rep.
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't count unfinished articles in the total shown at the top of the page. I count two unfinished arfticles in your list.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: It doesn't count unfinished articles
I agreed & this is the original scenario. But I found 39 article in the list and only 2 unfinished article so the summery should show 37 but showing 36.
Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman
I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.
|
|
|
|