|
In my case, it probably is my feet that smell, but this certainly smells worse.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
crazy info here...most likely means nothing. Googled monkey118 and see a name attached "Chris Pearson". we have a few Chris Pearson's here. Maybe monkey118 is a dummy account.
|
|
|
|
|
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just went to the guy's profile (that has been deleted I guess) and I'm getting the following:
Unable to load the requested member's information.
Which is fine but underneath it are the tabs (where the information usually would be) only the tab name's are empty and the tab pane as well.
It just looks strange.
I have a screenshot if you want / need it
|
|
|
|
|
How's it now?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Much better now
|
|
|
|
|
Please have a look at this[^].
There is no link for comments or improve question or so. UI a little different.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks fine to me Sandeep, everything appears normal
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I can still see the same thing. Strange! I got the screenshot if needed.
FF 3.6.12
|
|
|
|
|
Ignore the last message (i just deleted it).
i was curious why you could be seeing any difference, so opened up again, did a few CTRL+F5 and hey presto, i can see the issue also
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about that!
Turns out our redirection mapper thought "...task.aspx" sounded a little too much like "ask.aspx" and so setup the question in asking mode.
Fixed, will deploy tomorrow.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This guy[^] is being deliberately offensive including using the name of someone who lost a child.
Can you do something?
|
|
|
|
|
Vote to remove his message. The more we exercise this option the easier it will be.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Vote to remove his message. The more we exercise this option the easier it will be.
Hi Chris, I agree, and I appreciate the efforts you and your team has been putting in.
However, in case of "abusive" message (I am not referring to the one suggested by Trollslayer, as I am not aware of the same), I myself can remember clicking that option for several messages, where the language was abusive. However, the message was never removed. Is it like, the message would be removed only if 10 people report or so, I feel, in case people have reported the message, it would be good if any of the moderator has a look at it and then takes appropriate action.
Sucess is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.
|
|
|
|
|
Please accept my apologies, I knew it may have been considered bad taste, but thought there has been a long enough time period as to not of caused offence or upset. If you had of replied to the thread or e-mailed me direct expressing your feelings I would have deleted it myself immediately.
The Whiteboard - Surely the most remarkable invention ever?
|
|
|
|
|
I think it may have been more backroom material rather than the lounge, but I didn't think it offensive.
I have certainly heard worse.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Different people are offended by different things. The intention was humour though and not offence, so I would have deleted it straight away. I knew I shouldn'ty have watched Frankie Boyle last night!
The Whiteboard - Surely the most remarkable invention ever?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate - very much appreciated.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
They seem to be a tiny bit lethargic today.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I'd locked that bottle up.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I have been wondering if there is not a mechanism that can auto mark a question as being answered?
There are plenty of occasions when the question has been clearly and obviously answered and yet the OP doesn't bother to say 'thank you' by marking it as answered.
I would have thought it could be marked as answered after getting 5 5's for example or maybe allow members with platinum authoritah to go in after an answer is left open for a period of say 5 days.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: I would have thought it could be marked as answered after getting 5 5's
I guess, I am yet to get a 5 5's on any of my answer!
Nagy Vilmos wrote: I have been wondering if there is not a mechanism that can auto mark a question as being answered?
This has been discussed here quite a few times. As much I remember, something was decided for this and is in the TO-DO list.
|
|
|
|
|
This was discussed for a long time in this forum, and I'm still completely against this.
Only the person that posts the question can truly say it's the answer he wanted (or that worked). Many problems have several solutions, and allowing someone else (or the system) to mark a question as answered is just plain wrong. I think a "propose as answer" mechanism would be a better idea, and the user could get an email every time pushed the Propose as Answer button. I would also not allow the person that posted the answer to be allowed to propose it as an answer because the act of posting it implies it's the proposed answer.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
modified on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:51 PM
|
|
|
|