|
Soooooo... known bug?
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea what you mean by that sentence. The issue is the 2-character sequences <% and %> always get highlighted inside PRE blocks, whatever language is or isn't specified.
Like so (no lang, lang="C#", lang="text", lang="asp"):
<% blah %>
<% blah %>
<% blah %>
<% blah %>
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried to use the following text in my most recent tip/trick as part of the abstract:
<% %>
When I posted the tip/trick, that whole block of text was removed (or maybe wasn't displaying because it was never HTML encoded and the browser didn't know how to handle the characters). I then edited it to HTML encode the characters:
<% %>
That didn't work either. That entire block of text was missing. Is this by design? Shouldn't I be able to enter HTML characters somehow into the abstract for a tip/trick?
|
|
|
|
|
|
It looks fine now because I modified it to remove the HTML characters from the abstract. And I don't see anything that allows me to view the history of changes to my tip/trick... think I'll suggest that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, and viewing the history of changes may not have even worked. When I went to edit my tip/trick, the HTML characters had actually be removed from the abstract entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
Added to bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I'm wondering if the Q&A would benefit from a "Vote to Remove Answer" button on answers that would only be available to members of a specified level, so that if 3 or so of these members agree that an answer is completely innappropriate there would be a way to remove them completely as opposed to just 1-voting those answers. (ie. Experienced, active members in the Q&A)
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
People with the appropriate reputation level can already delete answers, and answers get deleted regularly.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Since I didn't know that, I suppose I can assume that I'm not worthy... (yet)
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you not see a red X? That is the 'delete' widget. A red flag is the 'report' widget.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
I do, but only my own answers. I only see the flag on others' answers.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes Kramer, For Delete QuickAnswers : Member should be Platinum Author, Authority, Editor or Organiser.
More info Member Reputation System[^]
My OT suggestion : QA section needs another editor like DD
thatraja |Chennai|India|
Brainbench certifications Down-votes are like kid's kisses don't reject it Do what you want quickly because the Doomsday on 2012
|
|
|
|
|
I'm glad the system is in place. I'm just wondering if anyone would consider removing duplicate answers that are blatantly added after the first. It seems that many members are simply doing this to either garner rep-points or because they are simply too lazy to read the answers that are already there first. Either way, I think the integrity of the Q&A's would go up if this were to be done. (I know it's easy to make the suggestion and that implementation is a whole different ball of wax)
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I reported a plagiarized article just a minute ago, but it immediately disappeared from the approval list. Backtracking to the URL showed it as approved, with all the comments removed (including mine), but now it is back[^]. Am I hallucinating?
|
|
|
|
|
One you report an article it disappears from the approval list. Good catch by the way!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
I would prefer to think he was halucinating, it's more fun
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
uʍop ǝpısdn uɹnʇ buıɥʇʎɹǝʌǝ sǝʞɐɯ ˙˙˙pıɔɐ ʇsǝʇɐן ǝɥʇ ɟo pןoɥ uǝʇʇob ʇsnظ ǝʌ,ı 'ןןɐ ɹǝʇɟɐ 'ǝןqıssod sɐʍ ʇı ןןǝʍ
|
|
|
|
|
I see! That explains it. I still haven't got the hang of this...
BTW, I figured out why the comments disappeared - I was looking at an older revision.
|
|
|
|
|
I am editing a question and I am told that I can't add new tags. I have to choose from existing list.
Do I not have sufficient points/privileges to do this? Are we no longer abel to add new tags?
|
|
|
|
|
It is lying to you!
Try Ctrl F5 and have another go.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: Do I not have sufficient points/privileges to do this? Are we no longer abel to add new tags?
No It isn't depends on privileges.
You must choose it among of list provided.
But apart of that I have noticed that some time it accepts custom Tags and some time it strictly prohibits for adding custom tags, It is something what I think is BUG.
Regards,
Hiren.
"The more we give of anything, the more we shall get back." - Grace Speare
(you can consider this quote while giving vote also)
Microsoft Dynamics CRM
|
|
|
|
|
According to this[^]; you should be atleast silver
- Author
- Authority
- Editor
- Organiser
in order to be able to create tags.
|
|
|
|
|
He is a Silver Organiser.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Ah I didn't see where he stood in the reputation hierarchy, but if that's the case then he should be able to do it.
|
|
|
|