|
Exactly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then there is no way for the OP to respond. The discussion is one way.
And what about if other people disagree with the delete.
Simon
|
|
|
|
|
Simon P Stevens wrote: Then there is no way for the OP to respond. The discussion is one way.
Generally, this case of delete's happen with new users or users doing spam. Further, I am not sure what would an OP respond to our comments for such thing. (Might be: 'Ok', 'I will not do it again', etc). As long as the message is conveyed to OP, that should do.
Simon P Stevens wrote: And what about if other people disagree with the delete.
Well, I guess thats why delete is reputation based and enabled for high rep people. It leads to an assumed that the person that has deleting power is sensible enough and would do right thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow has identified that this[^] site looks like it's stealing content.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: it's stealing content.
Looks like a total mirror of CP with few features like signing in disabled. I see a law suite coming.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps this would have been a better place to mention this. I can be really dimwitted sometimes [read often] ............
|
|
|
|
|
At least I gave you credit.
|
|
|
|
|
This looks like a job for *bleep* sharks with *bleep* laser beams on their heads.
Or at least ill-tempered sea bass.
|
|
|
|
|
Ian Shlasko wrote: Or at least ill-tempered sea bass.
Are they mutated?
|
|
|
|
|
No, we couldn't afford a decent mad scientist... We had to outsource.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for bringing it to our attention. The legal hamster wheels are already turning on this one but we may need to mutate the hamsters
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: but we may need to mutate the hamsters
Just add some arsenic-organic bacteria to their daily feed.
|
|
|
|
|
We're on it. Again.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just to forward an observation that has been noted.
Specifically in this Q&A entry, the username of the OP contains his email address.
Should the system perhaps have a rule associated with username creation that takes this into account?
I'm actually just forwarding on the suggestion. It was originally made on the provided thread by ManfredRBihy
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll add a warning to the profile page about email addresses in names.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The comments Here[^] are plagarised from Here[^]
The same user is posting apparently "useful" answers(which aren't when they are actually read against the question):
Here[^]
Here[^]
Here[^]
Here[^]
Or preposterous /semi functional code:
here[^]
plus others.
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. Comment deleted. Thanks Keith
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
It says "Do you have computer science desgree?".
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - thanks. I blame my incredibly laggy connection. Or something...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong forum (I think)
Please follow the signs that say 'Lounge'
|
|
|
|
|
the suggestion is: this forum should all by itself refuse messages about firearms. Some simple keyword searching should be sufficient.
|
|
|
|
|
Ooops - that's what I get for trying to do about a dozen things at once...
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|