|
Users either have access, or they don't. You're looking for a "Child Safety Lock" for your employees?
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
CD/DVD-Rom lockout? Why? What would prevent them from using a USB flash drive (or some other USB device) and using external files anyway? (I assume that is what you are trying to prevent.)
|
|
|
|
|
If you have the VB code, it should be fairly easy to translate...
...by someone who knows both VB and C#...
...me, not being one of those people.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a code example, but you can disable CDROM/Remoable Driver/etc. in Windows' Group Policy (at least in Windows 7)
|
|
|
|
|
Superglue.
Use a screwdriver to remove it.
Disconnect the wires.
As you see, lots of options available
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the advice, but NO.
|
|
|
|
|
It's ok, I was only joking anyway!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
This One[^]
does not do exactly what you want, but hope will be much helpful in the way.
|
|
|
|
|
What about ejecting from Explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
This tip[^] I posted sometime ago disables it, but not permanently.
You could make the app run at start up (perhaps a service) so it is effectively permanently disabled.
|
|
|
|
|
I have small number of GUI attribute that i need to save in my application.
The attribute are simple ( windows size, window color, ext... ) and they need to be store in file ( can be XML or binary ).
I don't sure i know what is the fest and best way to write the code ?
Is it simple XML or serialization ?
Is there some example ?
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dagnabit, I almost have that article ready...
|
|
|
|
|
My C# program was developed by the Visual Studio 2005, and i have set the prerequisites to .NET framework 2.0, and i have tested to install it on a Clean windows 7 it has included .NET framework 3.5, and it seems my program is working, but how could i force it to use .NET framework 2.0?
And also, there is .NET framework 2.0 SP3, how could i include it and force the client to install it manually?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
.NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5 consist of .NET 2.0 plus functional extensions, however they don't replace what was in .NET 2.0, they just add to it; therefore an app built against .NET 2.0 will normally run just fine on .NET 3.0/3.5
.NET 4.0 is different, it is independent of .NET 2.0, and offers a totally new set of libraries.
linuxfedora wrote: force the client to install it manually?
you shouldn't force a client to do anything.
what is your real concern about all this?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
If it is the case, then it is okey. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Since all of the .Net versions are merely extensions of prior versions, you don't have to wrorry about it. What you DO have to worry about is using framework objects/methods that become deprecated, because evetually, these objects/methods will be removed from .Net, and your app will refuse to work. What tis means is that you should probably update your tools to the newest versions, and rebuuild your app with the newest version of .Net.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this a WPF app? WPF uses URIs everywhere.
But anyways, somewhere you are specifying a URI in the wrong format. Or the control is. Did you try turn on all first chance exceptions? That might help you catch it when its really happening.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply. It turns out it was getting into an unexpected part of the code after the Invoke (), so I have to dig deeper.
|
|
|
|
|
when you want to close the thread, rather than remove the question and leave a messy thread, I would suggest you just append "[solved]" or "[closed]" to its subject line.
TIA.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|