|
PL-SQL supports overloading...
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe he's still paid by line.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
PRE tags please!
FUNCTION f_init
RETURN VARCHAR2
IS
vssqlerrm VARCHAR2 (255);
vsvalidation VARCHAR2 (255);
BEGIN
vssqlerrm := '';
vsvalidation := '';
RETURN vsvalidation;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
BEGIN
vssqlerrm := SQLERRM;
vsvalidation := vssqlerrm;
END;
END;
I'm not familiar with that language, but it looks a bit like it's a function that returns an empty string and has some unecessary exception handling. Quite the horror!
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but in this case the pre tags don't really help
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, some languages are hopeless.
|
|
|
|
|
aspdotnetdev wrote: I'm not familiar with that language
Looks like PL-SQL to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you asked your friend?
|
|
|
|
|
I was just given a project to rewrite, cleanup, and add features to. The first class I look at has these variables. It appears the original author liked to use almost every convention for naming variables, arbitrarily changing it up.
private string ip_addr = "xx.xx.xx.xx";
private int _port = 2000;
public int countQuotesReceived = 0, countQuotesCreated = 0;
public bool _connected = false;
public bool _initialized = false;
public bool BroadCast = false, ResetHighsLows = false;
public bool reconnecting = false;
modified on Monday, January 17, 2011 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Where's Hungarian?
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Here it is. Note, it's on a public variable, too. I should have posted more the first time. This is a copy/paste, so this is his spacing, and his ordering of the access levels:
public DataTable dtQuotes;
private QuoteHub _QuoteHub;
private string ip_addr = "xx.xx.xx.xxx";
private int _port = 2000;
public int countQuotesReceived = 0, countQuotesCreated = 0;
public bool _connected = false;
public bool _initialized = false;
public bool BroadCast = false, ResetHighsLows = false;
public bool reconnecting = false;
modified on Monday, January 17, 2011 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
So, it should be "m_dtQuotes" anyway.
Make his wages as consistent as his naming conventions. Bet he falls into line quickly.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, he's no longer at the company, not sure why .
I was hired to fill his position.
|
|
|
|
|
By Hungarian @OriginalGriff is looking for m_
|
|
|
|
|
|
By Hungarian I mean the type is prefixed onto the variable name as in iCount, lpszName etc. The "m_", "p_", g_" etc. metaprefix indates the scope: Member of class, function parameter, global and so on.
Once upon a time we thought this was a good idea! But then incremental compilation meant we could go back to readable, pronounceable variable names.
(I'm waiting for the next generation retrospective on naming, when we go back to a maximum of six characters, and the first character defines it as a integer if it is 'i' to 'n' so you don't even have to declare them...)
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: (I'm waiting for the next generation retrospective on naming, when we go back to a maximum of six characters, and the first character defines it as a integer if it is 'i' to 'n' so you don't even have to declare them...)
Good idea. Let us know when it is released
|
|
|
|
|
Don't remind me. I was downgraded by a professor for defining variables that just happened to start with i and j. Apparently, Pascal teaches you bad habits
|
|
|
|
|
rentzk wrote: Apparently, Pascal teaches you bad habits What do variable names like i and j have to with Pascal?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing that I remember: 'i' through 'n' inclusive being default declaration for integer, and the six character limit were FORTRAN.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I was in a bit of a hurry. Pascal was where I was taught to always define my variables. This was not appreciated by a very old school instructor who taught the FORTRAN class. Fortunately, the Pascal lessons stuck with me a lot better than the FORTRAN ones.
|
|
|
|
|
The m_, g_ etc. prefixes are all later inventions MS added when they started writing MFC (I guess, that's the first usage I ever came across). You don't really need them in C as the only scopes are global, file and local.
|
|
|
|
|
That's where I first met Hungarian notation.
The only problem is I still use a bastardized version of it: tb for TextBox, but for Button, dgv for DateGridView...
One day, I must try to make a clean break!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
You called?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
|
|
|
|
|
No, not you - your name doesn't start with a lower case letter, and is quite pronounceable.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
His name is probably the only Hungarian name that CAN be pronounced. Man, do they know how to mess up names, or what?
--
Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
|
|
|
|