|
It's too general a question: you can find basics by googling "encryption MSDN" - there are probably several different tutorials right there. Don't be so lazy!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
garfield185 wrote: But, it's been 2 hours since I wrote the question, and still no result.
No result? I gave you the link to a page full of results. Did you go and investigate any of them, or are you just going to sit here whining because no-one is doing your work for you?
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
If all you're doing is encrypting a password, why not just use the encryptions class built into the .NET Framework?? It'll save you from P/Invoking all those functions yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is that I must use RC4, and the advapi32.dll, because we have other applicactions in powerbuilder using this system.
I am supposed to follow the same steps.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Good Day,
I'm trying to create a dynamic crystal report viewer.
I need to show only the ACTIVE PARAMATER that is used by a particular report.
Sample:
Parameters in Report Status of Parameter
Company Used in report
Division Used in report
Date Not use in report
Ledger Used in report
I'm able to show the parameters on the form but it is reading all the parameters saved in the crystal report.
I need to ignore those who are not active.
Thank you for your help in advance.
tutzkie
|
|
|
|
|
Please someone suggest me
there is requirement to monitor the cd-rom
write operation detail that is - time n size of data
and path of file to be written on cd/dvd etc.
so my question is - i have to use imapi2 or iscsi dll.....
for your response
thank u in advance...
|
|
|
|
|
My Suggestion is: Don't bump your questions.
You posted this here 7 hours ago, and (presumably, I haven't looked) in Q&A at the same time.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
|
hi guys ............. nice to see u again xD
im wondering if i can get the current tab from navigator and if i can detect the change of tab using a function like GetForegroundWindow or something like this
thanks 4 reading ....
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks Pete ^^ but i don't know how to use this function in desktop app
please can u give me more info about it xD !!!! thx
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at this[^] article for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
First clearing that Java is two things Java language and Java Platform. Similarly .Net is two things the .Net supported languages and .Net Platform. Now come to major difference which is root cause of differences between Java and .Net
The ideal of Java has always been a Single language shared by multiple Platforms. Whereas .Net is based on Multiple languages shared by single Platform. Now come to derived differences from this major difference.
1).Net has Multilanguage support. While java has based on java language only. According to Microsoft latest news .Net support around 40 languages including major market share COBOL Vb.net C#.net Perl and many others.
2)Since java is multiplatform so it’s set of Framework Classes is limited to what is available on all platforms. While .Net has set of all the Classes available on Microsoft Platform.
3)According to Sun Java is renowned as “Write once run anywhere”. While .net has no such scene. But my perception is its not completely true to say “Write once run anywhere” but one aspect is that most of the applications written today focus on one platform only. Similarly to assure its multiple support much time needed to debug it on all platforms. So I would like to say Sun that it’s not “Write once run anywhere” but its “Write once and Debug everywhere.
4).Net due to disconnected data access through ADO.Net has hi level of performance against Java JDBC which requires multiple round trips to data base.
5)Java has support to open source platform while .Net has no direct support for Open source Platforms.
Java is a programming language designed to be run on many different platforms, and so uses a common language which has to be compiled and run on different platforms (eg. windows, mac and linux).
Microsoft, with their offering of .NET, takes on a different approach, by allowing you to program in any language you choose, but has compilers for many different languages that generates a platform specific code (i.e. Microsoft or Windows). Therefore, Java can be used to write programs for many different operating systems, and .NET can be used to make any programming language into a Windows program. This is all based on the original design goals of the programming language, and has both advantages and disadvantages over each other. For example, .NET would be good for integrating legacy code from different languages into a working program, when you don't want to re-write each piece of code into the same programming language. Both .NET and Java are otherwise object-oriented programming languages, with their obvious syntax differences
|
|
|
|
|
MaheshSharma wrote: Whereas .Net is based on Multiple languages shared by single Platform.
Start here[^]
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
Whats the use of writing this in C# forum?
|
|
|
|
|
a baffling question.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
You actually found a question in there?
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a question?
I must get a clever new signature for 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Originally, Microsoft did envision that .NET would be available on multiple platforms. They released large parts of the specifications for ECMA standards approval with the understanding that other companies would be free to develop implementations of .NET on different OS. The take up has not been as great as Microsoft hoped, but there are some other implementations such as the Mono project. To a certain extent, Silverlight was a similar concept - with a minified .NET framework that would be suitable for deployment over a browser connection to run on other browsers/OS. Had this technology been released two years earlier, it's probable that Silverlight would have much greater market penetration that it does; smart phones have enjoyed such a take up that Silverlight appears to be aimed more at "niche" markets than at widespread consumer markets.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: Originally, Microsoft did envision that .NET would be available on multiple platforms.
..and it is
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: The take up has not been as great as Microsoft hoped
There's also .GNU[^], off course. Less known would be the CrossNet[^] compiler.
That makes four different implementations of the same framework. I wouldn't expect that number to grow much, though.
I are Troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I can't quote the great Sir Paul Dukes because his book on Yoga was old when it fell into my hands and has since succumbed to floods, but his philosophy is the answer to the question you ask grasshopper.
Enlightenment is at the top of a mountain, lets call it programming nirvana. No matter what direction you approach the mountain, whether it be from C (Raja), Java(Tantra) or .NET(Hatha), all paths lead to the same point. The top of the programming mountain.
So pick your path carefully grasshopper.
BTW companies that pay lots of money to Microsoft also pay lots of money to programmers... well maybe not lots of money
"You get that on the big jobs."
|
|
|
|
|
As Confusus say: "All paths may lead the the mountain top, but just as with all roads lead to Rome, it is frequently better to choose a path which gets there quickly, rather than the one going via the Mariana Trench."
(Confusus was Confucius' younger brother, he avoided philosophy and instead went into IT)
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
Manfred R. Bihy: "Looks as if OP is learning resistant."
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't know Confusus was a Biztalk programmer.
"You get that on the big jobs."
|
|
|
|
|
Some good insights. I've never heard of using the multi-language capability of .NET for integrating legacy code in different languages. That's creative. I liked "write once and debug everywhere".
|
|
|
|