|
Thanks as always.
We've added a "report member" flag to members' profile pages that will allow you to report these guys directly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Readers Choice Awards link in post at top of lounge page goes to a page that says the survey has expired, which does not seem likely...
"People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them." Eric Hoffer
"The failure mode of 'clever' is 'a**hole'" John Scalzi
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Rob, should be back now
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obviously it's a "most recent first" order, but you're right; the solutions themselves should not be re-numbered, just re-ordered. This causes a lot of confusion when you're referring to "the previous solution", etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, actually it doesn't matter which tab I'm on, always solution 2.
I'd think it would make sense to keep the numbering in ascending order based on the arrival but solution ordering could be selectable (most recent/top rated). Within an hour it's easy to see the order of solutions but after that it's quite impossible if the solutions arrive close to each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relax, your honour's intact.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
8 Apr 2011 10:38 PM Answer Upvoted Authority Article Why, do while or while loop? -5
8 Apr 2011 10:36 PM Answer Upvoted Authority Article Why, do while or while loop? 5
That did not do me much good!
Is it a bug?
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
Naerling wrote: 8 Apr 2011 10:36 PM Answer Upvoted Authority Article Why, do while or while loop? 5
Probably a bronze or below gave you 4 or 5 first.
Naerling wrote: 8 Apr 2011 10:38 PM Answer Upvoted Authority Article Why, do while or while loop? -5
Then he changed his mind and gave 3.
Naerling wrote: Is it a bug?
Nopes! All good.
|
|
|
|
|
But wouldn't that be a DOWNvote then?
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
3 is neither an up-vote nor a down-vote.
|
|
|
|
|
But since I had a 4 or 5 and it was changed to 3 that would make it a downvote?
I am pretty sure I got what I deserved, not questioning that, but the -5 for UPvote makes me kind of confused
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the way it's handled is that the first event is the actual up-vote. So it gets recorded as:
upvote +5
The 2nd event is when they changed it to a 3, so what you see now is:
upvote -5
when it actually should say
upvote removed -5
It's the missing "removed" that is confusing. Makes sense?
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, got it!
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
1 & 2 are considered downvotes.
4 & 5 are considered upvotes.
3 is neutral.
Reputation point wise:
Changing 5->4 : No affect (It's still in upvote category)
Changing 1->2 : No affect (It's still in downvote category)
Changing 4->3 : Upvote to Neutral
Changing 2->3 : Downvote to Neutral
|
|
|
|
|
It's meant to have an indication that it was an undo action (as Nish has pointed out).
I'll add this to the bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Might save some confusion in the future
It's an OO world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your instincts are telling you this article isn't suitable for Code Project. Your instincts are good.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears that if a user has a negative number for one of the rep point categories, that number is not included in the rep total in the popup. This user's[^] rep total is -755, which is comprised of a -1221, 15, 2, 27, 422. The popup seems to only display 466, which is the sum of only the positive values.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
It's correct - but correct for a moment in time that's long gone.
The profiles are being cached too long - especially for an account getting absolutely hammered such as that one.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The profiles are being cached too long - especially for an account getting absolutely hammered such as that one.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb -- they're often *students*, for heaven's sake. -- (Terry Pratchett, alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|
|