|
How arrogant of you to automatically assume the the OP was confused.
How arrogant of you to automatically assume I am a native English speaker.
How arrogant of you to automatically assume I have no experience with multiple cultures.
You would do best to leave your arrogance on the desk, not in the keyboard and refrain from such assumptions. If you have a problem with that you can just as easily not respond or go somewhere else.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nischalke wrote: How arrogant of you to automatically assume the the OP was confused.
There is no arrogance here, only cultural difference. (which you can never understand as you have demonstrated here)
Mark Nischalke wrote: You would do best to leave your arrogance on the desk, not in the keyboard and refrain from such assumptions. If you have a problem with that you can just as easily not respond or go somewhere else.
People who follow these posts can easily understand who is arrogant.
Atleast, I am not arrogant to the level where I downvote rival answers to make sure my answer shows on the top and to ridicule and insult other answerers.
"Don't confuse experts with facts" - Eric_V
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote: I downvote rival answers
Ahww, are your feelings hurt. You get what is deserved and in case you haven't noticed, there are over 8 million users here.
ri·val [rahy-vuhl] Show IPA noun, adjective, verb, -valed, -val·ing or ( especially British ) -valled, -val·ling.
noun
1.
a person who is competing for the same object or goal as another, or who tries to equal or outdo another; competitor.
2.
a person or thing that is in a position to dispute another's preeminence or superiority: a stadium without a rival.
We are not competing for anything and you are not even close to being superior in anything.
ar·ro·gant
[ar-uh-guhnt]
–adjective
1.
making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud
You are the one making claims to know what people are asking and to automatically assume things, like their native language and culture, with nothing more than a screen name.
Now, once again, this could go on indefinitely and you could continue to show your ignorance and arrogance, but you are really just a passing annoyance, like a junior developer who has no practical experience.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nischalke wrote: We are not competing for anything and you are not even close to being superior in anything.
I did not try to exert my superiority, you did and it is evident from your behavior and your comments. (And don't tell me you don't downvote and ridicule rival answers).
Mark Nischalke wrote: You are the one making claims to know what people are asking and to automatically assume things
The OP is from India and I know what she meant. Was it possible for you to know it was "her" and not "he"? It was possible for me because of the same culture. (Not because of my superiority as you claim)
Mark Nischalke wrote: but you are really just a passing annoyance, like a junior developer who has no practical experience.
How did you assume this? And if you can assume something, why can't I? Why do you have a problem then? Again it's nothing but a blatant and shameless display of your superiority complex.
"Don't confuse experts with facts" - Eric_V
|
|
|
|
|
Shameel wrote:
The OP is from India and I know what she meant
Thats a bold assumption IMHO.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
我决定用中文试试~~话说您说的话好蛋疼……说英文一般要以容易理解通俗易懂为重……或许just a joke?
|
|
|
|
|
果断可以用中文~~恩,恩,8错
|
|
|
|
|
+5 Shameel, I think it's excellent form to ask fundamental questions, to say "is that what you really mean ?" when presented with bizarre use-cases, like wanting an 'image' of an e-mail !
best, Bill
"In the River of Delights, Panic has not failed me." Jorge Luis Borges
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: I think it's excellent form to ask fundamental questions
Thanks Bill, but certain people have a problem with both asking for clarification as well as inferring the meaning. So, when they see such a post, they go on a downvoting spree
"Don't confuse experts with facts" - Eric_V
|
|
|
|
|
Hey all, i was wondering if anyone knows if SharpPcap handles multiple ICaptureDevices in a single instance of an executable. What im programming is something to emulate multiple clients on multiple IP's on the same machine in a single instance of the executable.
Due to non-disclosure reasons i can not present code/concepts as what im programming is bespoke for a comms company.
the solution is running on windows 7 and i know that windows 7 supports multiple IP's
The issue im having is that if i run a single instance of the solution and then attempt to run two or more instances of a virtual client the first client gets disconnected and then the second one tries to connect but also gets dropped. But if i run two separate instances of the solution with a single virtual client each, both virtual clients work happily exchanging packets over the network.
I have the sneeking suspision windows does not allow processes to hook onto multiple IP's but if anyone can explain if im right or not would be of great assistance.
Ive thoroughly checked through the code and im sure each virutal client is definately iscolated. No device instance as far as i know is shared and i have not got any resource fighting from each client instance.
many thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to get the actual property value from a PropertyInfo object? I've tried the GetValue method with various parameters, but nothing works. I just get exceptions
|
|
|
|
|
Etienne_123 wrote: Is it possible to get the actual property value from a PropertyInfo object?
Of course it is.
Etienne_123 wrote: I've tried the GetValue method with various parameters, but nothing works. I
just get exceptions
You've posted here often enough to know that you should show both your code and the exception you get. If you'd care to post your code, we can look at it - but I suspect I know what part of your problem is here; I suspect you aren't passing the instance in to retrieve the value from.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a sample of a similar method I`m trying to use:
private string GetValueFromProperty(PropertyInfo pInfo)
{
return pInfo.GetValue(this, null).ToString();
}
The lines that are commented out are other options I've tried. All of the above gives me the following error: "Object does not match target type"
|
|
|
|
|
But how are you creating your pInfo?
|
|
|
|
|
List<PropertyInfo> properties = new List<PropertyInfo>();
properties.AddRange(someObject.GetType().GetProperties());
var pInfo = properties.Find(prop => prop.Name.Equals("someName"));
This allows me to retrieve the appropriate PropertyInfo object
|
|
|
|
|
And you want to retrieve the values from someObject, so use that in your GetValue call. For instance:
pInfo.GetValue(someObject, null);
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks that's the one thing I didn't try, and it worked
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. It's the commonest problem with it, which was how I guessed at the top.
|
|
|
|
|
5 for correctly guessing the source of the problem before code was posted. The questioner was indeed not passing the object that he wanted to get the property value from.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. The psychic filter didn't let me down today
|
|
|
|
|
hi i want use spider in asp.net please help me
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you have the keywords there. Google awaits you with an eagerness that's just a little bit disturbing.
|
|
|
|
|
First you need a fly, it is best to stun the fly by wacking it gently on the head, not to hard as it gets all squishy and spiders don't like squishy flies. Now I suggest you tie the fly with a piece of cotton and dangle him over the monitor, I find blue tacking the cotton to the top best. Wait very patiently an you may get a spider wander by and snap your fly.
BTW remember to turn off your screen saver you don't want the miss the spider when he comes looking for your fly.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
But asp nets are way too heavy for catching spiders. You need web technology for that.
ok, late on Friday....
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah but you should be able to cast your asp net to a web two right out of the box.
Less late on Friday but an early start on the weekend
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|