|
Thanks if the time comes I will cross this one off my list for backup.
I'm not totally useless, I can be used as a bad example.
|
|
|
|
|
I used Acronis True Image 2010 for several years, then tried to upgrade to 2011 and found out that backing up to network mapped drives didn't work. Never could get it to work, so I skipped it.
Bought 2012 4 weeks ago, still can't get it work properly, spent hours on chat with their support. Asked for a refund, get more responses that they want to make it work.
The product is a no-go. Don't waste your time or money on the 2012 version unless you're doing simple local drive backups.
Ralph Moses
|
|
|
|
|
rjmoses wrote: The product is a no-go. Don't waste your time or money on the 2012 version unless you're doing simple local drive backups.
Yeah that was my thinking also. I upgrades to 2011 about 3 months ago and wished I would have saved my money
now.
Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse
MCTS
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to configure ccnet.config file with a range of parameters for force build option but the Validator.exe program says: "Unable to load array item 'rangeParameter' - Cannot convert from type System.String to ThoughtWorks.CruiseControl.Remote.Parameters.ParameterBase for object with value:"The type of build to perform.CleanBuildBuild". I can't find the way and it makes me nervous.....
Thanks a lot and best regards!!!.
this is the project's section:
<project name="$(PruebaApplicationProject1)" >
<workingDirectory>$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)</workingDirectory>
<artifactDirectory>$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1) $(ArtifactDirectory)</artifactDirectory>
<category>Categoria 1</category>
<webURL>$(ServerName1)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ArtifactDirectory)$(ReportName)</webURL>
<labeller type="defaultlabeller">
<initialBuildLabel>1</initialBuildLabel>
<prefix>Project1-1-</prefix>
<incrementOnFailure>true</incrementOnFailure>
<labelFormat>00000</labelFormat>
</labeller>
<modificationDelaySeconds>1800</modificationDelaySeconds>
<maxSourceControlRetries>5</maxSourceControlRetries>
<initialState>Stopped</initialState>
<startupMode>UseLastState</startupMode>
<triggers>
<intervalTrigger name="continuous" seconds="600" buildCondition="ForceBuild" initialSeconds="600" />
<parameterTrigger>
<parameters>
<namedValue name="Type" value="Build"/>
</parameters >
</parameterTrigger>
</triggers>
<tasks>
<nant>
<executable>$(NAntDirectory)nant.exe</executable>
<baseDirectory>$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)\</baseDirectory>
<buildFile>$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ExtentionBuildFile)</buildFile>
<buildArgs>-listener:CCNetListener,CCNetListener</buildArgs>
<buildTimeoutSeconds>1200</buildTimeoutSeconds>
<dynamicValues>
<directValue parameter="Type" property="targetList.target[0]" >
<default>Build</default>
</directValue>
</dynamicValues>
</nant>
</tasks>
<publishers>
<statistics />
<xmllogger logDir="$(DriveCheckOut)$(WorkingMainDir)$(PruebaApplicationProject1)$(ArtifactDirectory)" />
</publishers>
<parameters>
<rangeParameter name="Type">
<description>The type of build to perform.</description>
<allowedValues>
<value>Clean</value>
<value>Build</value>
</allowedValues>
<default>Build</default>
</rangeParameter>
</parameters>
</project>
|
|
|
|
|
Why is this in the Free Tools forum?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Why is this in the Free Tools forum?
Why do birds sing?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Why do birds sing?
Because they do know the words.
Why are you following me?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
i have problem in it and error occur invalid parameter.
|
|
|
|
|
MahamEman20 wrote: i have problem in it and error occur invalid parameter.
What?
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
He's a spammer. Remove the message and the user.
|
|
|
|
|
Done; and so he should be.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a tool to keep track of user objects consumed by UI controls for a process ?
I want to know the User objects/GDI objects consumed by different UI controls available within a single process.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
Windows TaskManager can show that for the whole process: When you are on the Processes tab, select the desired columns from the view menu.
Even Process Explorer won't differentiate for single UI controls.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Hiller, Thanks for your reply.
But, Taskmanager can only show user Objects consumed by a single process.
But it did not give the control level details about which controls consumed how many user objects within that process.
I want to know - is there any tool available by which i can get the control level details also for a process about which control consumed how many user objects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't see why that was marked down, seems a reasonable question.
Have an upvote to correct.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
Trolls[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
I'm using Inno-Setup for my installation, I'm trying to use the {code} constant and when i compile the code it raises an error "Invalid prototype for 'ACADReg'"? what am I missing here?
here is the snippet:
[Registry]
Root: HKLM; Subkey: "{code:ACADReg}\{#MyAppName}"; Flags: uninsdeletekey; ValueType: dword; ValueName: "MANAGED"; ValueData: 1;
[Code]
var
AcadAppsRegSubKey: String;
function ACADReg(): String;
begin
Result := AcadAppsRegSubKey;
end;
|
|
|
|
|
Try posting to one of their newsgroups[^]. Not sure how much of a response you'll get at CP, I use InstallShield.
|
|
|
|
|
If a range of sector blocks are slow, mark it as used by dummy files. So the hard can perform better.
|
|
|
|
|
Jianxia5 wrote: If a range of sector blocks are slow,
What makes you think that can occur?
|
|
|
|
|
From experience, when I copy a lot of files, tens of thousands, about same sizes. some of them go fast, some of them go slow. I think it has to do with bad sectors.
|
|
|
|
|
If you seriously are developing bad sectors, then you need to stop looking for tools to identify the sectors and do the following:
1) Backup everything you possibly can: start with the critical stuff, and work down.
2) Get a new hard disk.
3) Re-install on the new disk, and put the old one away in a quiet drawer somewhere in case you forgot something.
One important thing I learned years ago: once a HDD starts developing bad sectors, it is a dead drive spinning.
The rest of the drive will fail. Probably soon, but Murphy's Law states that if you leave it it will fail at the worse possible moment. Use what time you have to save anything and everything, and replace it now.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the thoughtful answer. What I am talking about is original bad sectors coming from manufacture. Almost all hard drives have them, they just hide it so we normally don't see them. But those bad sectors could cause performance issues on hard drive.
I am thinking about writing an utility that can write a certain size files determine by an arguments onto a hard drive and time the process, and find out which ones take longer than normal then mark those files as bad performance area to avoid.
What do you guys think. My goal is to waste a little space on hard drive but keep the performance as high as possible for database and web access
|
|
|
|
|
Jianxia5 wrote: Almost all hard drives have them, they just hide it so we normally don't see them. But those bad sectors could cause performance issues on hard drive.
Not sure that is true anymore.
But if it is true then they are not being used - the hard drive software excludes them completely. So there is no point in skipping them.
|
|
|
|