|
Yeah, got it on Sunday (I have a habit of buying expensive gadgets when I'm depressed!)
--
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
|
|
|
|
|
benjymous wrote:
I have a habit of buying expensive gadgets when I'm depressed!)
Why so sad?
A pack of geeks, pale and skinny, feeling a bit pumped and macho after a morning of strenuous mouse clicking and dragging, arriving en masse at the gym. They carefully reset the machines to the lowest settings, offer to spot for each other on the 5 lb dumbells, and rediscover the art of macrame while attempting to jump rope. -Roger Wright on my colleagues and I going to gym each day at lunch
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there an easy way to view the user profile for an article author? If not, I think it would be good to add it.
Regards,
Victor.
phpWebNotes is a page annotation system modelled after php.net.
http://webnotes.sourceforge.net/demo.php[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Victor Boctor wrote:
Is there an easy way to view the user
What way do you think that the current author profile at the end of the article is 'not' easy to read??
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok I understand...
I was born intelligent Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
USe some sense!!!
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I mean, it happens frequently that I go to articles I have used in my projects, and I start to read the post at the bottom to see if I can find a solution to a problem.
70% of the questions don't have an answer... and sometimes the answers are cool, and deserve to be keep in a separated list (a "How to" list).
Actualy good answers are bury by the all question posted, and frequently, the questions are repeated several times from different people that didnt notice an answer.
I think that there are several solutions. I can suggest a simple one: a field flag near the Subject that indicates "queston" or "answer" (default = question) and a button, to filter the answers from the questions...
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how do we automatically pull out answers from 3600 articles and display them separately? The only way I can think of this being possible is if I change the message rating system to allow people to explicitely vote for whether a reply is a good answer to a post.
I can do this if enough people feel it will be valuable
cheers,
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, i have problem too. multi-thread version of code, make my form blink. why do not put a how to thread in article. a lot of people dont no how to thread, speacial multi. i read articles no mention of problem. tell me what wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
any chance you could put a different color scheme on the lounge or the soapbox? i occasionally post in the wrong spot because, well, unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page, there isn't a nice clear visual distinction (not like the VC++ forum, where the topics give it away).
-c
A | B - it's not a choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Oops. Meant to hit 5. That's twice now.
Jon Sagara
Hi! I'm Melanoma, Moley Russell's wart.
-- Uncle Buck
|
|
|
|
|
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?!
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?!
David, he is not a true believer. It is our job to convert him. Get his address and we can walk over and knock on his door, to bring him the True Light.
Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa
Roger Wright wrote:
Using a feather is kinky; using the whole chicken is perverted!
|
|
|
|
|
maybe you didn't read what i wrote:
unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page...
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Sure I did. The top of the page is where the forum's are shown in the table. The top of the window is where the address bar sits. You wrote "unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page, there isn't a nice clear visual distinction" - the URL is not a nice clear visual distinction as the position of the forum ID is not immeadiately obvious, hence I suspect you were referring to the "red and black" forum table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the top of the page, the first thing that hits your eye is the big red forum name bang in the middle of the page. Unless of course you are following a direct link ot a message like those you get in response notification e-mails, but those all state the forum name anyway. Or I suppose unless you are red-blue colour blind (can that happen?).
|
|
|
|
|
i'm gonna say it again:
unless i actually bother to look at the top of the page
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, to which I will say again:
What, you mean you can't tell a foum based on it's forum ID shown in your address bar?!
We've been full circle now.
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
Ok, to which I will say again
to which i'll say ... quit ignoring the point of the post.
a simple color change would make identification of the forum trivially easy (regardless of which link you followed, what the thread topics were listed, etc).
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote:
to which i'll say ... quit ignoring the point of the post.
I wasn't, I was making a valid point. IMHO changing the colour of one of the forums would be a stupid idea, it would remove the instant recognition that is it CodeProject.com and it would open the way for every single forum being individually coloured so those that can't be bothered to check they are posting in the right forum don't need to spend any effort. You come down on people who post programming questions in the lounge for missing the "no programming questions" notice, yet you don't expect yourself to be held to the same standard?
Even making more subtle changes such as, for example, a coloured stripe on the inside of the side bar would end up creating confusion for those not initiated into it's purpose. Look how many people are confused by the message colouring trigged by message voting.
A good solution would be to put the forum name in the document title, but that would still require some effort to read.
|
|
|
|
|
David Wulff wrote:
MHO changing the colour of one of the forums would be a stupid idea, it would remove the instant recognition that is it CodeProject.com
i totally disagree. and as proof that it's not confusing or detracting, i direct you to SlashDot. the forum colors change depending on the category the thread was put into (law, tech, entertainment, Mac, etc); in fact if you're on a Mac topic, the whole site flips into a kind of Mac OsX scheme (Aqua rounded edges and so on). but you never get the feeling that you've left /.
in /.s case, there's really no need to know which category a thread is in, because the rules don't change. but on CP, the rules do change (no programming Qs, PG-13, etc.).
i realize some people are afraid of change and wnat everything to stay the same forever. and that's ok with me, really. but, sometimes change is for the better.
-c
Fractals
|
|
|
|