|
he's got another message that needs nuking:
here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported - but I see you haven't reported them yourself yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^]. The "Vote to remove" link is missing for some reason...
|
|
|
|
|
All clean.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This guy[^] has been going out of his way to mark down articles without any good reason.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
EDIT: The messages have been removed.
Looks like their account will be gone soon, so here are links to their messages so they can be removed after the account is gone:
1
2
3
4
5
6
modified 12-Mar-12 12:53pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone who would call Nish's work crap is pretty stupid.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Similar comment on one of Sacha's articles, which is where I found him/her.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps they thought the article content so good they inferred it must have been copied and pasted from a "professional" source.
|
|
|
|
|
You mean that Sasha and Nish are only amateur at being awesome? Who knew?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: You mean that Sasha and Nish are only amateur at being awesome? Who knew? Clickety[^]
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it was Spam, just reposting as he hadn't had an answer when the OP was expecting one
Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, served in a Provençale manner with shallots and aubergines, garnished with truffle pate, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam - Monty Python Spam Sketch
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a reason for multiple re-posts. Finally, one of those questions was answered. Too bad I could not understand the question. But it was too short, not clear enough and formally not a question.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi SA, I've trusted your judgement on these spammers, but you have removed the messages these guys posted, and so cannot judge for myself whether the message was spam or not. Maybe it would be a better policy to wait until the spammers account has been disabled before removing the message, so that other members can confirm that the message is actually spam. I am sure that you could foresee your current policy being abused by someone, to get rid of a particular member that they do not like. Just a thought.
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe. I'm too much irritated by the space taken on the page. I still think better policy would be change of content like I do but not removing the post — this way it's easier to locate other spam posts by the account.
And you don't have to trust me or not: the original post remains in the history. Just click of version.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
SAKryukov wrote: the original post remains in the history. Just click of version.
I stand corrected - my bad. I never thought to look into that, thanks. In that case you are doing the best thing.
When I was a coder, we worked on algorithms. Today, we memorize APIs for countless libraries — those libraries have the algorithms - Eric Allman
|
|
|
|