|
Just re-vote.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry Chris, I was not clear. I went to the user's homepage and clicked "Report as spammer", there is no re-vote option there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
One whack administered to each post and the poster.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Finally. Believe it or not Elina and I were bemoaning the fact we had no spam on which to test some system. Fresh meat!
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Here - have some more[^].
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I don't automatically upvote your posts (a rep for you seems a little redundant) but I got a chuckle out of that, fresh meat indeed!
I remember when Lounge/Code requests were such a delight, I do miss some of the flame wars that went on in the old Soapbox!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, just a pity that things sometimes get out of hand, or worse, people just won't let something go and move on.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This place is A-OK for such a report. Would you be willing to allow the author to post an alternative article and clearly state what changes they have made to your code? My impression is the author merely needs some education on plagiarism.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Well, actually, I have no idea what to do in this case - hopefully, CodeProject team knows how to handle this. For now, this is almost exact copy of my code.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] user posted a spam article - it's currently held in the moderation queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please mark the messages as Spam. We're in the process of implementing a Bayesian filter to catch this stuff, so let's start training the spam sniffer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I saw that new option and marked appropriately.
Are you going to put a similar thing in the QA section?
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
Yep
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There is one guy Ian Shlasko, the account name is also same, his comment were totally absurd, he rates without any understand, his comment are also totally absurd, he post stuffs just to gain popularity and nothing else,
It really sucks when someone comments or rate articles without any understanding or just to put down others, i expect code project, to check whether he is an authorized guy or simply comments how he likes...
There is one more important thing, code project should give importance too, i respect code project as it has brought many mechanisms to maintain transparency,
The main problem is as rating is concerned, sometimes what i observed only ppl. who know you only vote you, or ppl. who dislike you or know other means give improper rating which your article deserves like 5* rating article can become 1* or 2*, what i expect or many wish will be we need to be is rating of the article should be done by designated ppl. like MVP's or code project designated ppl. who are solution experts, not by anyone, which can lead to serious problems, ppl. cheat in this kind of scenarios, even i have seen article which are nothing become 5* rated by 100's of member, articles which are really good will be rated to 2* or 3*. Irrespective of code project awards which effects true deserved one,
It also creates wrong impression on the s/w developers who want to use and know nothing in beginning, they go by rating, they may miss article which has 2 or 3* rating, but has good quality content and read 5* articles few might be crap, even i saw many such scenarios during my experience.
I insist code project, should nominate some subject experts to rate the article, by which thing goes fine, and true article which deserves good rating will be nominated and help readers
|
|
|
|
|
|