|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam or just plain stupid?
Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.
Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H
OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre
I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer
Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here[^]
Bill Gates is a very rich man today... and do you want to know why? The answer is one word: versions.
Dave Barry
Read more at BrainyQuote[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
|
User and answer both gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well the member seems to be a account for a company.
That company seems to have a solution to the question the OP asks (implementing licensing).
I can't see the answer in question anymore so can't be sure.
Sometimes linking to a free/paid product can be the answer the OP is looking for.
So I'm not going to report / vote either way but it might be something Chris wants to look into.
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I can't see the answer in question anymore so can't be sure.
Here the textual of the answer (without link): You will need to use machine-locked or activation based licensing scheme to implement this. For a ready-to-use scheme which has this features, try CryptoLicensing.
It's always this sentence to any question OP answers.
Tom Deketelaere wrote: but it might be something Chris wants to look into.
True!
|
|
|
|
|
Some of his answers are posted to questions that were asked almost a year earlier - that smells like rotting spam to me.
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't investigate his other answers so that might be true.
But to the answer in question here his answer could have been valid I don't know.
That's why I left it up to Chris to investigate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
splat.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like the offending post was removed...
|
|
|
|
|
|