|
It rates above 10%.
As a matter of fact, even if I checked "Subversion", I have some almost never evolving legacy projects in a VSS repository, without drama. A couple checkins a year, but still...
|
|
|
|
|
We unfortunately do
|
|
|
|
|
yes , we use SourceSafe and since one year subversion, but we move to mercurial in the next 6 month. What about IBM's ClearCase? I worked 5 years, not an easy tool but very powerfull, I miss it.
*** Fast Prototyping ***
|
|
|
|
|
Not only are we stuck on version 6 for some reason... We have Visual Studio 2010 connecting to it. I didn't even know that was possible before starting here.
|
|
|
|
|
And I thought my managers make poor choices.
|
|
|
|
|
Still do here but desperately trying to get management to invest in something more current. The size of the Add File dialog was a source (pun not intended) of amusement today. Tip, don't use deep folders!
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give you a hint: I edited one of the SourceSafe DLL's in Visual Studio's resource editor and fixed the dialog size problems.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Yes we do.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
What I'd really like to see is: What VCS do you use and then:
What VCS do you prefer?
I've used a variety but just by using them doesn't mean that I'd re-use or recommend them, and in fact some I'd avoid like the plague.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: What VCS do you prefer?
Perhaps that will be next weeks survey...
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
The question should read "which of these"...
|
|
|
|
|
Apart of the fact that still nobody has said is using the BaconVersionClistCtrl...
I'm using Subversion because a long long time ago it was the choosen one in my company...
But after hearing reading so much about GIT I've imagined that more people would be using it.
It seems that is not the case...
Is the reason that old one that says "if it works don't touch it"? or is there something else here?
|
|
|
|
|
The survey asks "What Source Code Control systems do you use?", yet only one answer can be selected. I happen to use multiple source code control systems (TFS and Subversion).
[Fixed by CM approx Mon 3-Sep-2012 10:00am]
/ravi
modified 3-Sep-12 10:31am.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, it should be multiple choice.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.
|
|
|
|
|
That's right. At work we have TFS but for private projects I use Git(hub).
|
|
|
|
|
True!!! Even I use TFS at work and Git at home.
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, even in our professional environment we currently have source in SVN, TFS and Git
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, CM fixed it a few minutes ago.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Any of these software.
I use TortoiseSVN interface for version control.
|
|
|
|
|
TortoiseSVN is just an interface for the Subversion. So You should vote for subversion. I too use TortoiseHG, which is a similar interface for Mercurial.
Every now and then say, "What the Elephant." "What the Elephant" gives you freedom. Freedom brings opportunity. Opportunity makes your future.
modified 3-Sep-12 0:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
I really din't even heard these software before.
CP is really helping much with these survey's,
- for getting new things &
- knowing which one is best of them all.
Thanks for reply Rahul!
|
|
|
|
|
Remember, that the survey is not about which Source Code Control system is the best, only about which are actively being used. That can be a huge difference.
|
|
|
|
|
..and why a particular Source Code Control System is more actively being used??
Just because it is best, right?
BTW, that's my opinion
|
|
|
|
|
That's usually never the case. Be it, that the best systems are relatively new and haven't had the time to get their market share or the masses just using mass products, maybe being easy to get started with or just fitting into the company strategy. Developers or company deciders may also be reluctant to change the tools they know.
When not talking about Source Code Control systems, the price might also be an argument, why the best product would not be the most actively used product (a bit off topic).
BTW we can at best only ever express our opinion
|
|
|
|