|
|
MEssage[^]
Luser[^]
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I've reported both the message and the account as abusive.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - spam - and have hit the "report" button.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
This one is OK. Apologies for the confusion.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
A bit of explanation would work wonders for me as the account had NOTHING published before that article, which would have been an indication to me that everything was good and well.
Still suspicious!
Regards,
— Manfred
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
We’re hosting some Ultrabook reviews and this is one of them. Some of the authors simply haven’t posted an article to CodeProject before, even if they have had an account for years. Hope this clears things up. I do admire your diligence though!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have deleted the articles - there is no place for plagiarism here. Voted to remove account as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - when I got to strike three I also voted the account.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please be aware that I will now delete the sock puppet answers. The accounts need the usual kicking.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Pete.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Message[^]
User[^]
Let fly!
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which browser / OS are you on?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I am on WinXP SP3, IE 8. Sorry if that is the reason
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
Link here[^]
Member here[^]
The reason I'm finding this offensive is that the user implies CP users are not professionals for not answering his question (as also heavily stated in my comment)
Also, out of rage I wrongly posted this in Site Bugs. Nuked it and moved here
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
For whatever reason, the question has been deleted.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Noticed. The member is still here though. Hopefully if the hamsters decide not to chew him, he'll learn a lesson
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Andrei Straut wrote: still here though
I do not think he meant to be offensive. He just kept changing the title of his question in order to bump it. That and I think that he thought that we are all paid to answer questions so he was not getting why someone was not immediately answering his question.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Wes Aday wrote: I do not think he meant to be offensive
That's what I wanted to say with "in case hamsters decide not to chew him". I do not know if he meant it or not, I just found it so, and I am perfectly aware it's ultimately Chris and Co's decision.
I may be one of the more vocal ones in Q&A, but I can't stand people thinking it's our duty (actually scratch me, your duty, as you're more regular than I am) to do the job they're usually paid to do.
If you go swimming with the sharks, you might damn well read what not do around them before you jump in, IMO.
Full-fledged Java/.NET lover, full-fledged PHP hater.
Full-fledged Google/Microsoft lover, full-fledged Apple hater.
Full-fledged Skype lover, full-fledged YM hater.
|
|
|
|
|
Another guy who is using sock-puppets, but has decided to become abusive as well:
OP[^]
At least two of the sock-puppets: 1[^], 2[^]
In this question, the OP is just a bit abusive, specifically Solution 1 & 4: Store procedureQuery problem[^]
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|