|
No, I believe you personally did not hurt this member. I'm just questioning the act of banning this account. I understand you did not do it.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
And, by the way, "it's hard to tell…", legally, is called "reasonable doubt". And the consequence is supposed to be this: in case of "reasonable doubt", no one could be dubbed guilty.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
You're applying American criminal law to a website... It's really just up to the admins to decide... not that I disagree that everyone needs the benefit of the doubt, but its just not necessarily the case in a site.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for being unclear; I'm not trying to apply American law, not literally; I just provide the example of reasonable approach, the analogy.
As to the "American law", well… there is no such thing even formally. In my view (sorry for the off-topic and questionable private opinion), there is no real law it all. There are written federal laws, state laws, a lot of exaggerated activity, but to me, it does not look like a Law from the capital letter 'L'. Well, in some other places, it's worse…
As to the principle of "reasonable doubt", the principle of "presumption of innocence", they are fundamental principles of the society. I hope not just Western…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just came to report the same one.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
It was the word "victim" that gave the whole idea away, wasn't it?
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
It was. Thankfully this guy is clearly not that bright so his efforts will also likely not amount to much.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Is all I can say about this one.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So you don't think Solution 2[^] is an appropriate answer to a programming question?
Spam reply member: tristlela90[^]
Soren Madsen
|
|
|
|
|
|
I flagged it as spam, which it is. If people want to advertise commercial products, then they should pay; after all, it's the advertising revenue that pays for our free access.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, it's spam - no perhaps about it ...
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] SPAM question is a lead in for a SPAM answer. The answer has not shown up yet.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
modified 23-Sep-12 21:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I've had one of those before. Maybe we need to refine our spam hunter capabilities and wait for for one who picks up the bait.
Worked for me the last time! That way you get two for the price of one.
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEssage[^]
Luser[^]
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I've reported both the message and the account as abusive.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree - spam - and have hit the "report" button.
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
This one is OK. Apologies for the confusion.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|