|
This one has been on my todo pile for a while, so as long as I am in ranting mode, I might as well get this off of my chest. It is a problem that is highly prevalent on many game developer forums, and especially so on one I often frequent, GameDev.net. Often, people will ask the question: "What should I do about college, is a game degree right for me?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
get both degrees..Will Not require much more effort.If you have spare cells then learn accounting also as only that will last much longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely get a computer science degree (preferably from a reputable University). I think game development is becoming like becoming an actor in Hollywood. Lots of people go to Hollywood hoping to make it big, but only a few actually make it big. Computer science is a broad field, keep all your options open.
|
|
|
|
|
Work began on the Hurd, the true kernel of the GNU operating system, in May 1991, but it has yet to materialise as a production-ready kernel. Richard Hillesley tells the story…
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really?
=====
\ | /
\|/
|
|-----|
| |
|_ |
_) | /
_) __/_
_) ____
| /|
| / |
| |
|-----|
|
=====
===
=
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting... particularly in the context of prominent GNU maintainers stepping down.
Director of Content Development, The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Nice review. When Linux had got dynamically pluggable modules, that is long ago, HURD had lost its single advantage. Since it was equally possible not to make modules pluggable, Linux was more flexible and had, even theoretically, better performance. No wonder nobody wanted HURD, a solution in search for a problem.
The only real difference between Linux and HURD is that HURD makes it easier for everybody to be a kernel hacker - something the process of Linux kernel development have proven to be fatal. Mr. Stollman thought that loosely organized crowds can do everything and was wrong. Linux has one digit percent penetration on the desktop just because the quality bar for poorly organized crowds in not too high. Mr. Stallman thought that what looks like a better design actually is a better design and was wrong. An experimental proof is always necessary. Finally, Mr. Stallman wanted GNU/Linux revealing his zero understanding of the idea of a trade mark. Tools have no right to claim products, if he was blinded by his ideas enough not to see that, no wonder Linus provided developers with better toys.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The Register
There’s a kind of cognitive dissonance in most people who’ve moved from the academic study of computer science to a job as a real-world software developer. The conflict lies in the fact that, whereas nearly every sample program in every textbook is a perfect and well-thought-out specimen, virtually no software out in the wild is, and this is rarely acknowledged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
before few days ....newsletter come properly bt from last 2 day not 1newsletter mail come.... check spam box bt there is no mail from codeproject newsletter .....
account settings is ok ....
plz help ...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Post this in the Bugs&Suggestions forum.
In some cases, my signature will be longer then my message...
<em style="color:red">ProgramFOX</em> ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|
There hasn't been one sent since the 21st; probably all the CP staff are on holiday break atm.
http://www.codeproject.com/script/News/List.aspx[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
My points are not increasing since yesterday, as I'm answering the question... Acceptance of solution and for Upvoting I got points but Answers..
Again is there a issue with site or something else is happening.. Please let me know.
Waiting for the positive answer.
-Krunal R.
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong Forum!!
Move it to Site Suggestion/Bug Reporting.
___ ___ ___
|__ |_| |\ | | |_| \ /
__| | | | \| |__| | | /
|
|
|
|
|
Okay.. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Small Basic puts the fun back into computer programming. With a friendly development environment that is very easy to master, it eases students of all ages into the world of programming. This list will eventually contain every program made via Small Basic. Explore the code, play with the apps... and submit your own.
|
|
|
|
|
Earlier this year I left the comfortable world of XAML and WPF behind and began developing almost exclusively in JavaScript. My daily focus has also switched from developing desktop applications to Single Page Applications (SPAs) using ASP.NET MVC and KnockoutJS: but, as we’ll see, JavaScript does not restrict me to web development.... I thought long and hard before making the move and, after twelve years in one place, I even changed jobs to facilitate the effort. I thought it would be worthwhile to share some of my reasoning behind this latest change of direction. We unfairly blame JavaScript for things that are not its fault.
|
|
|
|
|
Nobody likes to read complex code, especially if it’s someone’s else code. A preventive approach to block any complex code entering the application is by watching its complexity carefully. There are many measures of code complexity, the popular ones are McCabes cyclomatic complexity and Halsteads complexity. For JavaScript applications, there is a new tool from Phil Booth called JSComplexity which can be used to analyze your code and find out the complexity measures. As an example, let's look at the relative complexity of some popular JavaScript frameworks...
|
|
|
|
|
Why does Ruby share a single value across all of the subclasses? Why have a distinction between “class variables” and “class instance variables?” Where do these ideas come from? It turns out the answer is simple: class variables in Ruby work the same way class variables work in a much older language called Smalltalk. Class variables aren’t the only idea Ruby took from Smalltalk.
|
|
|
|
|
In programming language terms, I seem to be doing some kind of just-in-time compilation. The first time through, I read and interpret every instruction. Afterwards, it seems like I remember what this function does and am able to determine its output much quicker. Interpreting the first call takes about 24 seconds, while I blow through the second one in about 10 seconds. They put coders in front of an eye tracker. This is what they saw.
|
|
|
|
|
There’s been some great discussion over the last few years about mobile first versus web first.... I don’t believe this is the right way to think about the issue, though. I think we are using the wrong definition of ‘web.’ The web definition I’m focusing on is as a set of technologies used for storing and disseminating information. I use ‘web client’ as the front-end technology and customer-facing portion of the site. Client technology aside, is it really a "web" if you're just consuming a single endpoint?
|
|
|
|
|
The Fourier Transform is one of deepest insights ever made. Unfortunately, the meaning is buried within dense equations. Rather than deciphering it symbol-by-symbol, let's experience the idea (hear the song then read the sheet music, dig?). Think With Circles, Not Sinusoids.
|
|
|
|
|
When I first began writing about Apple security the situation was bleak yet meaningless. Bleak thanks to a company that didn’t prioritize security and not only responded poorly to issues, but left the platform wildly exposed to potential attacks. Meaningless, since said attacks never actually happened in the real world. As much as I may have fretted over the lack of security features or what the future might hold, my worries were trifles considering a near-complete absence of actual problems for users.... Today Apple is the second most popular brand in the world... with dominating sales in smartphones, laptops, and tablets.... Never before have so many users relied so much on the security efforts of the company from Cupertino. Gatekeeper, sandboxing and an increasing willingness to actually talk about security openly.
|
|
|
|