|
Some more tidbits that look spammy:
Quote: We do have a sponsor already. More are welcomed!
Sounds like money grubbing.
Quote: we would propose doing an iterative course preparation strategy where each segment of the course is built by as many developers as possible
Seems like they are recruiting people to contribute content.
Quote: I would appreciate any of your thoughts on the matter?
After the money grubbing, the recruiting free workers, and the linking to the site, this question seems like a smoke screen to pass off the spam as a genuine question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is a second one.
Not sure which one is the 2nd one, so I'll post both.
Spammer 1
Spammer 2
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q&A answers. Either this guy has a real fan or he's sock-puppetting his answers.
[Edit] Pulled the link to give OP a chance to respond to gentle suggestions.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
modified 21-Feb-13 20:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Do not report him yet, I am curently going through all the answers and looking deeper.
|
|
|
|
|
The number of "solutions" that are utter crap but upvoted was my trigger on this guy. (Just to provide insight as to what tipped me off.)
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I have seen that. But it seems to me that he has many answers marked as solution from many different questioneers. I'll give you a feedback as soon as I am through all.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not worried about those. Those are valid as such, even if the answers are really not great. The concerning this is simply the consistency of his answer being the only +5 on the page, even when his solution is accepted along with others this tends to be the case, so there was a clear targeting of his answers.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I know what you mean. I am still in pogress with checking his answers...
|
|
|
|
|
Spent 3 quarter hours investigating on this guy. Still not sure about him...
3 bad things caught my eye:
- As you said - there are many of his answers were voted 5. Seems suspicious to me but somehow this is not the final proof I was looking for.
- He has answered 3 questions of "Member 8054539". Maybe this is his sock puppet?
- He is always begging for likes like "plz vote and accept ans if it helps. "
Whenever the OP had further questions for his solution he answered to them.
To be honest: Even after diving deeper into his answers I just can suggest around because he seems like an active member to me (or he was once active).
In my opinion there should be the possibility to give him a slight nudge. Maybe one of the Admins can talk / send an email to him before we just nuke his account, what do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll pull the link to his profile for now.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This one: Tlhako Ya Setso[^]
Spreading the word in this weeks survey[^]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Message[^]
user[^]
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
User is gone but messages are still there. need some more hits
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both the user and question are gone.
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
|
User account deleted, but the answer needs a couple more spam hits: How to save attachemnts from .MSG file[^]
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone!
In some cases, my signature will be longer than my message...
<em style="color:red"> <b>ProgramFOX</b></em> ProgramFOX
|
|
|
|
|