|
Even if our system is having trouble verifying you have cookies enabled, an email is still sent.
If you don't get an email then you need to check your spam filters and settings.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Some time I received email and some time I did not receive email and when the email received with password that password did not work for log on to codeproject.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see an option readily available and can't therefore confirm my e-mail account.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
You should have received an email from us when you signed up. Otherwise try this page[^]
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
In Quick Answers, I usually scroll down to C# and click to limit the results to a language I know a little about. Last Wee I did so, and got the humorous result:
Sorry, no entries were found matching tags C#, C#
I posted about it in the Lounge, we all got a good laugh about it, and moved on. But this morning I get the same message, so it apparently is not the momentary glitch I thought it was.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a load issue. We're working on redoing our caching level in the next couple of weeks to tackle this issue
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I also get the notification box on this forum.
It was working this morning, and I haven't changed email address or anything which should be causing CP to say I need to reverify.
|
|
|
|
|
Periodically you need to confirm that the account is active against an email account. I guess you are now due for this confirmation.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to reverify. The message should have a link to the send confirmation email[^] page that sends an email with a link. Click the link and you're gold.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, just seemed weird that I needed to do that when nothing's changed on my end, but if it's intentional then that's cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestingly, that author appears to have deleted all their articles.
|
|
|
|
|
That article has been removed. You're viewing an old version.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is just me:
I'm looking at Who's Who, ordered by reputation (& "All Types"). I noticed SAK's account [^] isn't there, it should be between Christian's & Sacha's. If I put "Sergey" in the search name, he still isn't on the first page. If I put his full name in the search box, there he is.
“Education is not the piling on of learning, information, data, facts, skills, or abilities - that's training or instruction - but is rather making visible what is hidden as a seed” “One of the greatest problems of our time is that many are schooled but few are educated”
Sir Thomas More (1478 – 1535)
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed it has a tendency to leave a few people out, I suspect because their profile is busy being updated or is otherwise engaged but it could be something else. As a result I don't tend to look at the Who's who page if the site is busy.
"The secret of happiness is freedom, and the secret of freedom, courage."
Thucydides (B.C. 460-400)
|
|
|
|
|
|
At present if you navigate to;
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/ - it obviously takes me to my membership profile
How about adding some more routes into the grand scheme of things such as;
http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/articles
/tips
/messages
/comments
/questions
/answers
/reputation
/etc.
At the moment, if I do http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/articles[^] it still takes me to my profile.
It will help making links look a bit better etc. etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really want http://www.codeproject.com/Members/daveauld/reputation? I'm not sure the servers would be able to cope trying to figure that one out?
|
|
|
|
|
Not particularly, I was in free flow typing mode, only really need the key items.
|
|
|
|
|
Got the draft through for the case study. I am surprised how well it has come out! I have sent back a couple of ammendments and basically authorised the release on the back of them.
For some amazing reason, you even get a mention
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on my own case study now. I potentially have two of them to do, and there's some other things I'm looking at for Intel. They are just so cool to work with.
|
|
|
|
|
I sometimes wish I had more hours in a day and didn't have my real job to be getting on with!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well I never........
|
|
|
|
|