|
Not a big difference to me. I already explained you my point of view, we can only discuss something more concrete if you really want. I personally see nothing inappropriate. Come on, OP still needs to learn those basics, and this is what he really needs, not the "answer". Okay, if nobody says it to him, and who would be the looser?
Again, I say that the real confusion was just because you did not see original message from OP, don't know how would you react. It's removed now, and that's good, but please don't try to make me look more stupid.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Not only are you being ruthless by coming here to a forum where you know a 400-poster doesn't hang out, you don't even invite him?
More like a stab in the back. And you say
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: OP still needs to learn those basics
Huh? Forgive me ceasar, but whose garden is this once again?
|
|
|
|
|
No, I did not. 
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
You did not get it. I say, I did not invite him, confirmed what you say.
Look, I settled the conflict with OP and went on continuing to help him, if you did not notice, and he is talking to me normally, but you cannot stop, or what? Maybe, it's time to consider your behavior, too, just to make a good company?
I always helped people even of they are rude, just try to oppose something which I think should not be tolerated, from time to time. How about you?
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: always helped people even of they are rude
Absolutely. History outs this misundersanding.
Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov wrote: How about you?
I fold. (there's no emoticon for jumping sheep)
|
|
|
|
|
Wish you the best of luck.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
The bad words (which I haven't been able to read) were uncalled for, but I believe it wasn't entirely OP's fault. The guy had a straightforward question and, sorry to say this, but you gave him an answer that is totally not related to what was asked. Instead, you pointed out the flaws of his code, and you mentioned that he has totally no clue on the topic, which can also be true, but there are plenty of ways of saying it without offending the OP.
I think, when answering questions, we also need to be aware that each of us have different ways of learning, as well as how we accept criticisms and understand things, so we should also be responsible in phrasing our answers so that it would not look harsh for the OP. After all, isn't that the purpose of Q&A? To give developers a push on the right direction and not make them look stupid?
You and the other folks in Q&A have been providing excellent answers since before and those were really invaluable. But sometimes, it's nice to make self-evaluations once in a while if we are really following what was in the bottom of Submit Solution widget, especially the last sentence.
Signature construction in progress. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Clean up, please!
brisingr_aerowing@Gryphon-PC $ rake in_the_dough
Raking in the dough
brisingr_aerowing@Gryphon-PC $ make lots_of_money
Making lots_of_money
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like he's nuked!
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
What are we supposed to do with them?
This for example: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=86299&aid=635396[^]
It's three sentences, one of them "Please download and do it" and it looks more like a question than anything else.
And the only option I have is "Approve".
Approve it for what? Execution?
So what are we supposed to do? Ideas, anyone?
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: more like a question
Seems more like a request for someone to download his code and rework it to meet his requirements. He needs to be referred to rent-a-coder. Seems weird that it can only be "approved".
modified 11-Aug-13 11:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
I have deleted it. Chris is aware that there aren't enough options for reference articles.
|
|
|
|
|
What are Reference Articles supposed to be?
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly what the name would suggest. Articles that act as references.
|
|
|
|
|
Does that mean they can be copies of someone's work or would that still be considered plagiarism?
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I have not been able to find a description about expected/acceptable content of Reference articles.
I did notice Chris changed some of his articles to be Reference articles, including CP article #1: Braces and brackets[^]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
At the top right of each article is a box that provides a little info on the article, including the type. The type is actually a link to an explanation page[^].
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
 My bad. Thanks Chris.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
References to what?
Who decides? Surely not the author, if they are to be references in the sense of "the standard work on the subject" - that should be the readers, shouldn't it? And if it is, why does it need approval? If it isn't then again, why does it need moderation approval?
Surely you can't just write something and decide "this is the definitive article" and publish it directly as such? (Because I can see that being abused PQD!)
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
I gather that they are meant to be for such things as a list of ASCII characters, that type of thing. Basically, short articles that can be used as a handy one stop location for information - for instance, the syntax of Dependency Properties.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
