|
|
|
I have amended the question so as to leave the answers - as they are good answers. I have also deleted his comments asking for getting the text.
|
|
|
|
|
This lot are definitely copied from here - how can I tell?
I wrote them!
http://www.technobits.net/authors/OriginalGriff/[^]
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
I guess to be fair when clicking an article link it does redirect to CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Chris handled this earlier[^]. Earlier, if you clicked on a link on that page, the site did show the CodeProject article in a frame. Now, it just redirect to the original CP article.
|
|
|
|
|
Just checked they have links to a couple of mine there too, and it did link back to CP.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you get it wrong this time Griffy?
It looks like the site just links to existing articles, the links send to CP (the original articles you wrote)
--
If money is your hope for independence, you cannot reach it.
Being loved gives you strength,
while loving gives you courage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Old posts are fair game ...
|
|
|
|
|
...for what? Spammy answers? Rubbish answered designed only to artificially inflate reputation?
If we don't allow it on new posts, why should old ones be "fair game"?
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: allow it
What? It's on the server. Which the where. Which, incidently, IS the "nook and crannie" of the CP designers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As these blog posts are automatically picked up, I wouldn't spam post the user - he/she's posted a lot of none spammy blog posts.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, I removed the user from my message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article is gone.
What to do with the user? He seems to be quite inactive, but except from the article you have reported the rest seems to normal use of the site.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And more barcode spammers!!!
This is an very old question and Solution 2 & 3 are true spammers that almost cannot write a single sentence in clear English because the intention is to just get the spam link posted and nothing more.
I think a good suggestion for codeproject site would be to NOT allow "new answers" to old questions to stop this kind of spam
|
|
|
|
|