|
While this isn't, strictly speaking, a topic that's suitable for Site Bugs/Suggestions, there are resources here on CP that already cover this. Try searching through the articles of Shivprasad Koirala[^].
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly, that's a damn suave profile pic. The puts us to shame.
Second, we have a bit of a dichotomy with accounts: There is your site membership (eg your CodeProject or RootAdmin) number, and there is your network-wide profile number. Your profile is the thing that allows you to log on to any site (Workspaces, codeproject.com., codeproject.tv etc) using the same email/password, but once on a given site you have separate memberships.
We are in the middle of ripping the guts out of this and switching it around: You'll have a single account (email/password) and then on each site you'll have a site profile that allows you to customise the given site.
Hence the two terms you're seeing. Profile ID != Member ID. Profiles.Count > Members.Count.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
That explains the situation.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
This message should say "N items need approval", since the items could be spread across articles, blogs, tips and reference items.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I still think of all of them as articles, and I would prefer to be clear that we're talking articles and not, say, catalog items or forum messages.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
This implies that we should talk about articles, Tips and References as Big-Articles, Medium-Articles and Tiny-Articles.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
That's how I talk about them
(Actually I talk about Article and ArticleViewModel entities and their associated ArticleTypId - but I have a slightly different perspective than most)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: but I have a slightly different perspective than most
The curse of those who know the code behind
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears my suggestion has been accepted (and in fact improved upon, by adding the detail byline). So the "answered" icon attached to this post should probably be changed to "fixed".
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I was *just* hunting for your original message so I could ping you.
Thanks for saving me the trouble!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I was *just* hunting for your original message ... Yes, I know. My keylogger (cleverly disguised as a must-have CP article) informed me of the fact.
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Oh dear.
*That* explains a lot.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawk eye
|
|
|
|
|
Maciej Los wrote: There are only 2 answers:
No, he has 12 answers: 7 on the first question and 5 on the second question.
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFox wrote: No, he has 12 answers: 7 on the first question and 5 on the second question.
Formally, you're right!
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw this as well.
An overflow?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Brisingr Aerowing wrote: An overflow?
Only if they've discovered a new 23.3-bit integer type!
A 23-bit integer would overflow at ~8.4 million.
A 24-bit integer wouldn't overflow until ~16.8 million.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This is an issue with a database call failing, but there is clear and unambiguous code to fallback to a previous value.
Clearly my code doesn't understand the terms "clear and unambiguous".
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
On the TODO[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
-1 members (55,313 online)
modified 15-Mar-14 7:09am.
|
|
|
|
|
Participant Sign in Point not added as soon as sign in
|
|
|
|