|
Good spot. IMHO it's the same illegal!
I send it to @Chris-Maunder, he may have some experience with this kind of things...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it's already gone
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The VB version's gone, but the original C# version is still up:
YouTube Downloader Using C# .NET[^]
IANAL, but I'm guessing that if one violates the ToS, then they both do.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like he has taken the article down.
I did see a debate about this issue recently (last week?). I am not sure where, but I think it was in the article section of a similar article. Someone pointed out, that as we browse around the Internet and click on various video links, they often bring up a YouTube video even though we (as users) have not been presented with the terms and have not accessed it (knowingly) through the YouTube website.
I am not sure I possess the expertise to determine whether the code is legal or not.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I see you point, but there is a huge difference between you seeing a page with an embedded video (using YouTube approved player) and between you writing a code that directly violates the terms...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Reported
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
|
|
|
|
|
Cheers - deleted.
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] member, here[^] in QA posted a wall of code and has done nothing but post nonsense "solutions" to it. Seems like abuse to me.
|
|
|
|
|
He done in a few more times - see his history...
Pretty he doesn't know that he can accept his own answers!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
It's an abuse.Lets nuke him
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are some more 'questions' - that 13 voting give him time to post a lot
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Not in QA - I've been tidying his spills up as soon as he makes 'em!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: that 13 voting give him time to post a lot
You shouldn't have abused the vote to remove button then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answers gone and i guess you forget to report the member
To learn all there is to know. I know I'll be disappointed one day, but I've made a good start, and the eventual disappointment is likely to be brief.
-Roger Wright
|
|
|
|
|
Jas 24 wrote: i guess you forget to report the member Oooops . Thanks, reported.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|