|
I'm confused as well. In the supposed plagium source (social.tecnet...) it says just the way around, that the original is here in CP and points to it.
You should delete the links
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm confused, or the links are going astray.
Origianl article states Quote: This file is an authorized copy of the following article by the same author with a link to the CodeProject article.
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
10th and final kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clean
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Luser[^]
Message[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
|
|
|
|
|
Both gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In this case I don't think the self accepted answer are abusive. He has more than 30 question and only self accepted 2 of them. Besides the solutions are not quick after the question and he is thanking for the help and giving what he did to solve the problem.
About the silly message of the girls or the "asdasxdca" message... that's another question
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: only self accepted 2 of them
Come on,we have functionality that after reports, some of them gets deleted. You are seeing just 2,that doesn't mean that there were only two. How its possible that you posted 5 questions and found answer to each of them yourself,accepted only yours even if there are far better solutions available?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan has started working... Please join him.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Why? Is he falling apart? Should I bring glue?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Since when does youtube live stream?
BTW, user was gone (lounge is quite fast), but the message is still there
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I did wonder!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: But...spam linking to "private" video? Don't get it...
That confused me as well. Maybe we had a puppy spammer there who didn't get the way spam works yet
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|