|
By showing the existing responses you influence the taker to answer in the same way. Or perhaps this is an experiment to see how many test takers respond this way. I have a headache.
|
|
|
|
|
I find it odd that they did the survey this way. I completely missed the Vote Now link at the bottom. It doesn't even look like a link.
THE kung fu crab
|
|
|
|
|
I do not get any answer choices...only the survey results show. Is there another link I need to use?
|
|
|
|
|
There's a small link at the bottom that says 'Vote Now' that you can use. Though perhaps it should be the other way around, showing the voting choices with a link to go straight to the results.
|
|
|
|
|
Or a BIG colorful, blinking link. It took me several seconds to find it...
|
|
|
|
|
He's probably working on the basis that if you can't find the button then you shouldn't be taking the survey
|
|
|
|
|
Vote Now
....for the flashing link. bring back the blink
|
|
|
|
|
Chris, I suspect that almost all developers would need to make multiple choices. E.g. I work in-house and I develop desktop solutions for internal clients, web applications for internal clients, customers and partners and sometimes web services too.
When I worked in a software house, pretty much "all of the above" could apply!
I guess that some consultants and independents might be highly specialized, or even in-house developers specifically in the technology field, but I suspect that's not the norm.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too. We're only developing and maintaing one application and it's both used by internal and external consumers. I wonder just how many options could be valid for developers workling on multiple projects?
I suppose this question is meant more in the sense of "choose the option that fits your project(s) best/most of the time", and probably that's good enough for most people.
GOTOs are a bit like wire coat hangers: they tend to breed in the darkness, such that where there once were few, eventually there are many, and the program's architecture collapses beneath them. (Fran Poretto)
|
|
|
|