|
Well, I think this is the place to report actual, or potential, spammers. I leave it to Chris and the hamsters to decide what action to take.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleaned the article, Member still there.
The console is a black place
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] from this[^] seems to be taken from here[^]. I wrote a warning message to the article, so let's see...
|
|
|
|
|
They aren't waiting 24 hrs anymore. This[^] is spamming "recovery tools", in this[^] spam setup question.
You can lead a developer to CodeProject, but you can't make them think.
The Theory of Gravity was invented for the sole purpose of distracting you from investigating the scientific fact that the Earth sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edit: no report needed links leaved to allow more opinions
This user[^] has his 2nd article[^] in the moderation queue (first one here[^]). The already approved article is in the "3rd party tools" section.
To be honest, I like how he wrote the articles, but he is promoting how easy it is to do that using a product. From the site of the product:
Quote: The trial version has some limitations but you can try all the functionalities of the SDK with the trial.
This reminds me some spammers we had a time ago promoting a solution to interact with MS-Office files "very easy". The trial was free as well, but many requesters complained about purchasing demands and we started banning them.
Is here to be considered as the same? no, because of 3rd party tools allowed in own section
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 7-Oct-14 6:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
As it is all-right to put such an article in the right category (3rd party tools) I had other problem with those articles - if you remove images and code dump (which in most cases needless) you left with nothing. Not even a tip...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks for your opinion.
I'll remove the links to avoid not needed reports
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Member shown the door; message still needs a few kicks.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This user[^] (created today) is resurrecting old questions[^] to add a description of a product with a link to another site.
The answers are related to the question, but (one is 1+, the other 4+ years old so far).
Is that still in the "valid" area? or is it to be reported?
My opinion is yes. Created today, search for related questions (no matter how old) and directly posting links. But I would like to know your opinion about. Would it be enough to warn him? Or let's take the hammer?
BTW, he got hit by the links-bug in one of the questions and the posted links are actually pointing back to the QA item.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
No question here, but a spammer IMHO...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Message gone, mine on user was the 10th but it is still alive, I guess someone selected other option by reporting.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not sure, it might be legitime, but it is near the border line in my opinion.
It seems he already spoke with @Sean let's see if he reads this and gives opinion.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I have already rejected it and spoken with the author. The article isn't live and available to everyone ... I think you're looking at one specific revision somehow.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Good. I was confused as it felt bad but was on the border so I couldn't decide...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks for answering sean 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
