Spam and Abuse Watch

12-Oct-14 5:28

IMO we really need to let him go... Sigh | :sigh:

Nelek13-Oct-14 8:42

13-Oct-14 8:42

gone

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

And again - gone

Nelek11-Oct-14 23:01

11-Oct-14 23:01

This tip[^] is copied from here[^]

M.D.V.

modified 13-Oct-14 14:43pm.

And again

Wendelius11-Oct-14 11:45

11-Oct-14 11:45

This[^] is copied from here[^]

Nelek13-Oct-14 8:43

13-Oct-14 8:43

gone

M.D.V.

Also plagiarized

Wendelius11-Oct-14 11:41

11-Oct-14 11:41

The same member[^]: This[^] taken from:
- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/ms241613(v=vs.110).aspx[^]
- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13176256/asp-net-production-server-pdb-files[^]

Nelek13-Oct-14 8:43

Addition to below message - gone

13-Oct-14 8:43

gone

M.D.V.

Nelek11-Oct-14 8:21

11-Oct-14 8:21

Original report[^]

His other article[^] (already approved) is plagiarized as well.
The first paragraph is just a literal copy from here[^].
The second paragraph from here[^]
The text in "package designer tabs" is copied from here[^] (the pictures are not a literall copy, he has at least edited them to make the connectors, but they are in the same link as well)

M.D.V.

modified 13-Oct-14 14:44pm.

Plagiarized

Wendelius11-Oct-14 5:55

11-Oct-14 5:55

This[^] is mainly taken from MSDN. Few examples:
- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms137728.aspx[^]
- http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms140223.aspx[^]

Nelek11-Oct-14 8:27

Which of the Denver web designing company is best for its services?[^]
from http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11145689[^]

11-Oct-14 8:27

gone

M.D.V.

modified 13-Oct-14 14:44pm.

Spam Question

André Kraak11-Oct-14 3:05

André Kraak

11-Oct-14 3:05

0100000101101110011001000111001010000010

The Boy Scout Rule[^]

Re: Spam Question

CHill6011-Oct-14 3:13

CHill60

11-Oct-14 3:13

Question gone. Member needs the (Denver?) Boot

Spammer

Jochen Arndt11-Oct-14 2:28

Jochen Arndt

11-Oct-14 2:28

The user http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11145515[^]
has posted a lot of spam would be articles.
Articles are gone (except http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=144211&aid=828178[^]) but user needs some more kicks.

Re: Spammer

CHill6011-Oct-14 2:40

CHill60

11-Oct-14 2:40

That article also now closed. Member still needs more kicks

Spam would be article.

SoMad10-Oct-14 21:27

SoMad

10-Oct-14 21:27

Member: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11145204[^]
Article: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=144195&aid=828124[^]

Soren Madsen

"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty

Re: Spam would be article.

CHill6010-Oct-14 21:31

CHill60

10-Oct-14 21:31

*laughing* Thought it was just a review until I finally spotted the member name. Blatant advertising!
Now, where are my glasses?!

Spam

Wendelius10-Oct-14 20:03

10-Oct-14 20:03

This[^] from this[^]

Despite of the title: Nonsense

Gone

Dave Kreskowiak11-Oct-14 3:23

Dave Kreskowiak

11-Oct-14 3:23

Final kick applied.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

Click this: Asking questions is a skill.
Seriously, do it.

Dave Kreskowiak

Spam

Richard Deeming10-Oct-14 7:36

Richard Deeming

10-Oct-14 7:36

Spam: http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/4920502/RESTful-Plugin-for-eclipse-helps-the-user-to-creat.aspx[^]
Spammer: http://www.codeproject.com/Members/karthy86[^]

"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer

Re: Spam

Dave Kreskowiak10-Oct-14 17:05

Dave Kreskowiak

10-Oct-14 17:05

Message gone. Users needs another couple of ticks to the 'nads.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject

Click this: Asking questions is a skill.
Seriously, do it.

Dave Kreskowiak

Shouldn't be public

Wendelius10-Oct-14 4:45

10-Oct-14 4:45

This[^] article contains information/instructions that in my opinion shouldn't be published. But what do you think?

Re: Shouldn't be public

Pete O'Hanlon10-Oct-14 4:50

Pete O'Hanlon

10-Oct-14 4:50

I'm pretty sure we rejected that one at least once before.

Re: Shouldn't be public

Nelek10-Oct-14 14:08

10-Oct-14 14:08

Now we have a 2nd chance

M.D.V.

modified 11-Oct-14 14:30pm.

Re: Shouldn't be public

Nelek10-Oct-14 23:37