|
Spam Q and Spam A deleted - the authors need more kicks though.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User on 10 but still alive
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing that the outcome of the previous report was a "spam" and the article closed then.
I tend to agree - without the pay-for service it's pretty much useless, so spam is probably the best description. Did anyone post a "warning shot" with the previous version?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Did anyone post a "warning shot" with the previous version
No. I was about to do so,but i didn't receive any response with that post. Let's try it out. I suspect author is unaware about how we consider/handle spam.
Theres also a problem that Report flag is not available at any of the messages.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a plan to me!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code is very problematic - it uses a specific (payed) service to deal with SMS, and the solution next to nothing without it! To me it seems problematic, the question is how innocent the author is...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
תפסיק לספר לה' כמה הצרות שלך גדולות, תספר לצרות שלך כמה ה' גדול!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing that the outcome of the previous report was a "spam" and the article closed then.
I tend to agree - without the pay-for service it's pretty much useless, so spam is probably the best description. Did anyone post a "warning shot" with the previous version?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see any warning on any of the revisions... (it was in-out since July)
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
תפסיק לספר לה' כמה הצרות שלך גדולות, תספר לצרות שלך כמה ה' גדול!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi OriginalGriff,
Both the profiles are same. So, from where it is taken?
|
|
|
|
|
Curses! Lack of coffee...link fixed.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Cool. I am also going to have coffee. Feeling cold.
Cheers!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Out of interest, does your company pay people extra if they get any old rubbish published here? Or is the rash of plagiarised or total drivel "articles" from members labelled "mindfire" purely spontaneous?
Because it gives me the impression that 99% of your employees are total idiots, and I wouldn't want to use the company as a result!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, they are not aware of the Guidelines of posting contents in Code Project and they have mentioned company name on their profiles.
Ideally they should have spent time on reading and understanding the Guidelines and following that up.
|
|
|
|